Don't faster cards download and read faster to the computer?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Greg Lovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 1/19/2005 4:58:19 PM
> Subject: Re: *istD storage
>
> See this thread at DPReview:
>
> http://forums.dpreview.
Maybe you're lucky, I can't even get to the site. (Can't be resolved).
Tim Sherburne wrote:
For some reason, he took the Pentax scores off. I'm not sure why, and I
couldn't find an archive.
Tim
On 1/19/05 11:50, Frantisek wrote:
Hi Ken,
try looking in www.robgralbraith.com
Good light!
f
;
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: *istD storage
>
> I have:
> 1GB Lexmark 80x with WA
> 1GB Sandisk Extreme
> 1GB Sandisk Ultra II
>
> The two first have approximately the same speed (9s per RAW image),
> while the Ultra II is slightly slower.
>
> D
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Hauck"
Subject: *istD storage
I remember seeing *istD benchmarks of compact flash
card read performance a while back but I didn't save
the reference. I'm thinking of getting either a
Lexmark 80x card with Write Acceleration or a SanD
For some reason, he took the Pentax scores off. I'm not sure why, and I
couldn't find an archive.
Tim
On 1/19/05 11:50, Frantisek wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> try looking in www.robgralbraith.com
>
> Good light!
> fra
>
>
>
Hi Ken,
try looking in www.robgralbraith.com
Good light!
fra
I have:
1GB Lexmark 80x with WA
1GB Sandisk Extreme
1GB Sandisk Ultra II
The two first have approximately the same speed (9s per RAW image),
while the Ultra II is slightly slower.
DagT
På 19. jan. 2005 kl. 18.38 skrev Ken Hauck:
I remember seeing *istD benchmarks of compact flash
card read perfor
I remember seeing *istD benchmarks of compact flash
card read performance a while back but I didn't save
the reference. I'm thinking of getting either a
Lexmark 80x card with Write Acceleration or a SanDisk
Ultra or Extreme. I would like suggestions on what
will give the best performance. I'm us
8 matches
Mail list logo
