Am too.
At 03:50 AM 8/6/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>Oh, you're no fun.
>
>--- Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Lets not get back on the subject of self dating.
>
> > At 04:37 PM 7/29/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> > >You are dating yourself there :) Christmas '75 -
> > don't
> > >remember that o
Oh, you're no fun.
--- Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lets not get back on the subject of self dating.
> At 04:37 PM 7/29/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> >You are dating yourself there :) Christmas '75 -
> don't
> >remember that one, and not because of what I was
> >drinking (I was on a brea
Lets not get back on the subject of self dating.
At 04:37 PM 7/29/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>You are dating yourself there :) Christmas '75 - don't
>remember that one, and not because of what I was
>drinking (I was on a breastmilk diet at the time).
>Just out of curiosity - which camera took the ph
Bgpentax wrote:
> The UV filter is INTERNAL with the 17mm Fish-Eye !
and better than that, from usage of mine (SuperTak) it seems
more towards a skylight in effect - a UV w/ some punch! :^)
Bill
-
Juan J. Buhler wrote>> Does this 17mm have provision for back filters? If
so, make sure you're using one, at least the UV one. Back filters are part
of the optical design, and are not optional as filters you mount on the fron
of a lens. The way you describe it it sounds like you're missing it...<
The UV filter is INTERNAL with the 17mm Fish-Eye !
You are dating yourself there :) Christmas '75 - don't
remember that one, and not because of what I was
drinking (I was on a breastmilk diet at the time).
Just out of curiosity - which camera took the photo,
the ?Leica or the Spotmatic, or perhaps some unseen
camera in the background?
Jody.
---
Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
>
> Hi Caril,
Sorry, my spell-checker played a bad joke here...
Boz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Cyril MARION wrote:
> I wonder about the top performance and adjustements of the 17mm f/4
> fish-eye. I bought one some monthes ago, and since then never managed to get
> a correct focus in the viewfinder for objects located "far". In fact, when
> the focus ring is on infinit
Hi, listers,
I wonder about the top performance and adjustements of the 17mm f/4
fish-eye. I bought one some monthes ago, and since then never managed to get
a correct focus in the viewfinder for objects located "far". In fact, when
the focus ring is on infinite, only the objects located about 6
10 matches
Mail list logo
