On 2007-06-09, at 03:27, Mark Roberts wrote:
Would be? You mean will be. Nikon users will go first, within
about a
month. ;)
Within one month Sony users will see new mid-level class model but
still with APS-C sensor, which should be completely new development
much improved over the one
On 2007-06-09, at 05:32, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Pentax will go FF 35mm, theres tons and tons of FF 35mm PK
lenses out there to use that kind of body with great results.
With scary prices when bought second hand lately, and it would be
even worse when Pentax would release FF DSLR :-(
Cheers,
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Probably true for Nikon. Pentax will stick within 1.3 crop.
Pentax will build cameras with whatever sensors are available as
off-the-shelf parts from Sony and/or other manufacturers.
This will include bigger-than-1.3 crop before very long.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 9/6/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
This will include bigger-than-1.3 crop before very long.
My goodness, I'll have to buy a second hat !
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 07/06/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you just imagine the noise and abuse that would generate from all
the
people who have invested heavily in one size smaller format lenses?
Yes, it would be slightly amusing.
Would be? You mean will be. Nikon
On 09/06/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would be? You mean will be. Nikon users will go first, within about a
month. ;)
I expect, as I've been predicting ever since smaller-than-full-frame
lenses first appeared, that it will just automatically crop when these
lenses are mounted.
They could do that, but they won't bother. (Maybe after a couple of
months of agonized screams from the user base there'll be a firmware
upgrade).
Mark Roberts wrote:
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 07/06/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you just imagine the noise
Probably true for Nikon. Pentax will stick within 1.3 crop. Or maybe
not:-). Doesn't matter. What we can buy now works with what we have
now. And the DA* calendar stretches out pretty far into the future.
Paul
On Jun 8, 2007, at 9:54 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
They could do that, but they won't
That's quite possible down the line. But it's all speculation. 1.3
crop or so may well be the limit for Pentax DSLR. Or maybe not:-).
On Jun 8, 2007, at 9:46 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 09/06/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would be? You mean will be. Nikon users will go
I think they'll bother this time. They may not even go there --
larger than 1.3 or so. The DA* lenses seem to be their brand
statement. If they're smart, they won't just walk all over it. I
suspect that if Pentax ever goes beyond 1.3 crop, it will be with a
645 camera. It's just good
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 11:22 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: 22 MPix digital MF under 1$
I think they'll bother this time. They may not even go there --
larger than 1.3 or so. The DA* lenses seem to be their brand
statement. If they're
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 22 MPix digital MF under 1$
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 10:33:56 +1000
On 07/06/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you just imagine
Yes, it is reality, with stanrard lens:
http://www.mamiya.com/cameras.asp?id=1id2=2281
I think we can be sure that integrated Pentax 645D using similar
sized CCD would be even cheaper... Now if only Hoya would allow
Pentax team to release 645D...
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote..
Yes, it is reality, with stanrard lens:
http://www.mamiya.com/cameras.asp?id=1id2=2281
I think we can be sure that integrated Pentax 645D using similar
sized CCD would be even cheaper... Now if only Hoya would allow
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote..
Yes, it is reality, with stanrard lens:
http://www.mamiya.com/cameras.asp?id=1id2=2281
I think we can be sure that integrated Pentax 645D using similar
sized CCD would be even cheaper... Now if only Hoya
- Original Message -
From: Wilko Bulte
Subject: Re: 22 MPix digital MF under 1$
I think we can be sure that integrated Pentax 645D using similar
sized CCD would be even cheaper... Now if only Hoya would allow
Pentax team to release 645D...
Assuming the 645D is ready
Actually the assumption is that the 645D is canceled, based on what I'd
call Pentax's Wiggle on the Hook plan. We really don't know anything yet.
Christian wrote:
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote..
Yes, it is reality, with
On 2007-06-06, at 20:24, Christian wrote:
Umm, news is that the 645D has been canceled.
Nothing was officially announced so far, there were just rumours,
rumours and once again rumours ;-)
--
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 22 MPix digital MF under 1$
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:49:59 -0400
Actually the assumption is that the 645D is canceled, based on what I'd
call
Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 22 MPix digital MF under 1$
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:49:59 -0400
Actually the assumption is that the 645D is canceled, based on what I'd
call Pentax's Wiggle on the Hook plan. We really don't know anything
yet
.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 22 MPix digital MF under 1$
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:49:59 -0400
Actually the assumption is that the 645D is canceled, based on what I'd
call
factor body at high yet relatively
affordable prices would likely have a bigger market than the 645D ever
would.
Tom C.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 22 MPix digital MF under 1
From:
Christian
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote..
Yes, it is reality, with stanrard lens:
http://www.mamiya.com/cameras.asp?id=1id2=2281
I think we can be sure that integrated Pentax 645D using similar
sized CCD would be even
potential customer base for that than for a 645D.
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 22 MPix digital MF under 1$
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:49:59 -0400
Actually
From:
Adam Maas
Considering that the 645D was most likely using K10D-based electronics
changed only enough to handle the Kodak sensor(which is significantly
larger than 24x36), that would gain us exactly what?
How much significantly larger? Full frame *PLUS* maybe?
--
PDML
John Sessoms wrote:
From:
Adam Maas
Considering that the 645D was most likely using K10D-based electronics
changed only enough to handle the Kodak sensor(which is significantly
larger than 24x36), that would gain us exactly what?
How much significantly larger? Full frame *PLUS* maybe?
- Original Message -
From: Tom C Subject: Re: 22 MPix digital MF under 1$
If it were me, assuming that a reasonable profit margin could be realized,
I'd revamp the 645D guts and put them in a K10D style body and attempt to
sell a high end DSLR that uses regular K-mount lenses
On 07/06/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you just imagine the noise and abuse that would generate from all the
people who have invested heavily in one size smaller format lenses?
Yes, it would be slightly amusing.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
28 matches
Mail list logo
