armon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://personal.mia.bellsouth.net/~genius91/
- Original Message -
From: Mark Stringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: 28-105 powerzoom vs 28-70/4
: I own both and like both. When I bough
battery
pack, a very light combo for family shooting or walking around. However, I
also am gravitating back to primes for speed and quality.
- Original Message -
From: "adrian sorescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 1:48 AM
Subject:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:07:54 -0500, Mark Cassino wrote:
>I have the black 80-320 - aren't the two identical except for the color?
I don't know. That's why I asked. :-)
> I personally have found it to be a very nice lens.
That's what I needed to know Wonder why they dropped the black one?
I have the black 80-320 - aren't the two identical except
for the color? I personally have found it to be a very nice
lens.
- MCC
At 10:44 PM 3/10/01 -0600, Gary L. Murphy wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 23:19:45 -0500, Mark
Cassino wrote:
>For me - the 28-70 and 80-320 make a great pair, easy to c
At 11:19 PM 3/10/01 -0500, you wrote:
(Hey - just now understand what "Pz" stands for!)
Hehehe. Now guess what MZ stands for!
Todd
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pen
I have both the FA 28-70 and the FA 28-105.
Optically I'd consider them to be nearly equivalent. There is some light
falloff in the 28-70 that seems to be worse than in the 28-105, but in
terms of sharpness etc I don't see any difference between them -- but, I
have never done formal tests.
T
6 matches
Mail list logo
