Matjaz,
When I bought my Sto-Fen for my AF360-FGZ, I contacted Sto-Fen and they
recommended the OM-PZ4.
It isn't a perfect fit, but some electrical tape, rubber band or
something like that will make it fit.
Michael
Matjaz Osojnik wrote:
Bruce,
can you share which type of Stofen Omni-Bounce
Thanks,
Matjaz
> Matjaz,
>
> I use the regular one. With TTL, it works great. I seem to get a
> little more even light than with the Omni-Bounce.
>
>
> Bruce
>
>
Matjaz,
I use the regular one. With TTL, it works great. I seem to get a
little more even light than with the Omni-Bounce.
Bruce
Sunday, March 2, 2003, 2:17:20 PM, you wrote:
MO> Thanks Bruce. Actually, I have been also thinking about Lumiquest
MO> Softboxes (mini and regular one) as well
TECTED]
> Sent: 02 March 2003 15:17
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 360FGZ, swivel
>
>
> Bruce,
>
> can you share which type of Stofen Omni-Bounce fits to AF360FGZ
> head? I'm thinking to order one but there is no mention of
> that flash on
> their web p
Bruce,
can you share which type of Stofen Omni-Bounce fits to AF360FGZ
head? I'm thinking to order one but there is no mention of that flash on
their web pages. Is the same as for the AF500FGZ (model OM-C) or
something else?
BTW, does somebody know which fits to AF280T head?
Thanks,
Matjaz
Michael,
My guess is that regular TTL can't be used. The other DSLR's out
there have had to go to something akin to P-TTL. Older flashes would
probably work fine in Auto mode or Manual.
Bruce
Saturday, March 1, 2003, 12:42:09 PM, you wrote:
MC> I agree that the AF360-FGZ has some limitatio
Right on! I've been so happy with Sto-Fen that I have an Omni-Bounce
for every flash I own and I seldom shoot without one.
Len
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 4:38 PM
> To: Frantisek Vlcek
>
Frantisek,
My experience with bounce has not been that good. I always end up
with shadows under the eyes. I have had MUCH better luck using a
Sto-Fen Omni-Bounce or a Lumiquest SoftBox on the flash. For me, the
lack of swivel is a non-issue.
Bruce
Saturday, March 1, 2003, 12:07:15 PM, you
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 21:07:15 +0100, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
>Hi,
> I am wondering, how many of you who use 360FGZ, lack the swivel
> feature? For me, the inability to bounce flash from side wall or
> wall behind me is a major fault, and what about portraits! I hope a
> new FGZ is in the maki
Hi,
I am wondering, how many of you who use 360FGZ, lack the swivel
feature? For me, the inability to bounce flash from side wall or
wall behind me is a major fault, and what about portraits! I hope a
new FGZ is in the making, with power of the 500FTZ. I wonder, the
Ist D doesn't hav
10 matches
Mail list logo
