On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Brother Chris,
>
> I think that you have to get a 67 body - a lens by itself won't cut
> it. You have to feel and experience that weight (power!) to become
> part of the brotherhood.
Alas, Brother Bruce, you misunderstand. I *have* a 67, as well as th
: Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: 67 Brotherhood
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
>> Brother Chris,
>>
>> I think that you have to get a 67 body - a lens by itself won't cut
>> it. You have to feel and experience that we
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 01:13 PM, Jim Apilado wrote:
> I don't own a 67. Alas, only a couple of 645 Pentaxes. If there is a
> Brotherhood of the 67, I wonder how many sit at the 645 Pentax table?
I believe that the Pentax Medium Format Brotherhood is open to 645
owners (though somet
Brothers, the 645ers should be permitted as acolytes who are still learning The Way of
the Big Neg, but if we expand to other brands, it may be difficult to get a quorum to
decide important things. For example, what color robes should be worn at the
meetings? I vote for 18% gray.
Pat White
-
At first, I just sort of ignored this thread. But, now it's getting
kind of funny...
Fred
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On 18 Feb 2002 at 12:44, Pat White wrote:
> Brothers, the 645ers should be permitted as acolytes who are still
> learning The Way of the Big Neg,
Acolyte my ass.
While you big fat stodgy 67ers are mumbling incantations, wearing goofy robes,
consulting chiropractors, and hauling 50 pound packs
T Rittenhouse wrote:
> Can those who use an LX be little bitty brothers?
Why would an LX user want to be part of this Brotherhood of Bloat?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Moose hats
Good idea. Wheatfield Willie can buy 'em all for ya. He lives in
Saskatchewan. They have mooses there, don't they, Bill? Moose hats
would be considered "formal wear" at Taylor Field, no?
-Mat-boy
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> William,
>
> Yeah, what he said! I just want to make
- Original Message -
From: Mrs. Reed
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
>
> I rarely ever want to be part of a "brotherhood."
We use the word "Brotherhood" in the most inclusive way
possible.
Mrs Reed, I think true happiness for you is just around the
corner. A mer
"tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 18 Feb 2002 at 12:44, Pat White wrote:
>
>> Brothers, the 645ers should be permitted as acolytes who are still
>> learning The Way of the Big Neg,
>
>Acolyte my ass.
>
>While you big fat stodgy 67ers are mumbling incantations, wearing goofy robes,
>consultin
William Robb wrote:
>
> Tsk Tsk, as juvenile a display of name calling as I have ever
> seen.
Mean-spirited? You misunderstand. I am just seeking a suitable,
non-judgemental description.
Thanks for the nice words about age, though. It has been many decades
since I looked or felt like a juve
ry 18, 2002 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
> - Original Message -
> From: Mrs. Reed
>
> Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
>
>
>
> >
> > I rarely ever want to be part of a "brotherhood."
>
> We use the word "Brotherhood" in the most i
William Robb wrote:
I say Mrs. Reed needs a Pentax 6x7.
What say you, Brothers of 6x7?
Shirley. I mean, surely she does. Seriously, the 6x7 has made me a
better photographer. First, I'm enjoying my time behind the lens a lot
more. Second, I work harder at trying to find good shots. That's partly
T Rittenhouse wrote:
> they are going to have to give up their single malted
> scotch, and cigars, and the soft jazz in the darkroom?
The single malt and soft jazz are essential to quality darkroom work.
Cigars, however, fog the lens.
Paul
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
You'd think that would slow the barrage down at any rate.
At 06:12 PM 2/18/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>OK you girly-boys,
>
>I've decided to move up to a larger format. A bigger neg with a much
>quieter leaf shutter appealed to me. The LX is too noisy. The 67 is
>too noisy. It was time to get ser
Only if your name is Jinx and well, it seemed funnier in concept.
At 08:44 PM 2/18/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>If the plural of goose is geese, wouldn't the plural of moose be meese?
>
>Bill
>
> > Moose hats
> >
> > Good idea. Wheatfield Willie can buy 'em all for ya. He lives in
> > Saska
Bruce wrote:
> Yeah, I think we are gonna need to broaden the Brotherhood a bit.
> Include 645 and need to decide if this is a general brotherhood or a
> Pentax brotherhood.
... and what of us MedFormat-types that are "stuck" having
to use a meager 6x9cm 1950 Voigtlander Bessa
This is starting to sound more like a cult
with every message reply.
Pretty soon you'll all be driving VWs
and drinking Dr. Pepper! :)
*
"Get over it."
Dr. Laura
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Pat wrote:
> ... permitted as acolytes who are still learning The Way of the Big Neg
Ah, but the magnificent 6x9 neg allows for croppong down to
645, 6x6 and 6x7 as well. Plus the potential for 9cm wide
by various heights panoramas.
All you MedFormat guys' negs
Paul wrote:
> a result of having only 10 frames on that roll of 120. I shot around 20
> rolls in the last week, with as many keepers per roll as I typically get
> on a 36 exposure roll of 35mm film.
Sad - very sad, indeed. Are you saying that you get, on average,
less than 10 ke
Hey! Don't forget me! I have a Yashica D!
William in Utah.
PS. I wonder how many of us Y-M owners there are on the Pentax list
anyway.
frank theriault wrote:
>
> Hey, Bill and Dave,
>
> We don't need no stinking 67's!
>
> I say we start our OWN brotherhood. Just us three. To hell wi
Come on, boys, settle down now. You're all becoming too giddy. It'll all
end in tears, you know.
What nonsense. A 67 Brotherhood.
If this silliness persists, I'll just have to form my own exclusive
association for 110 owners.
A 67 brotherhood not just for male members? Hah, co
- Original Message -
From: Bill D. Casselberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
> Bruce wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I think we are gonna need to broaden the Brotherhood a bit.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
>
> So true. In between the tiny 35mm format and the bulky 6x7,
the true wise ones
> follow the Confucian middle way ;-)
>
No, Sir, between the tiny, small, miniscule, ever so little 35mm
m
- Original Message -
From: "T Rittenhouse"
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
> Don't let them fool you Ma'm they only reason they want a
sisterhood is
> because someone has to wash their robes and cook their gruel.
I wonder if
> these guys realize they are g
Hey Shel, is that a Sylvestre?
William Robb
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/street-shooter.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komko
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, T Rittenhouse wrote:
>...I saw Aaron and Bill gathering faggots
I had to read that twice before my dirty mind gave up making rude
remarks...
I'll just get my pitchfork and join the rabble.
dave "rhubarb! rhubarb!"
--
dave o'brien - http://www.diaspoir.net
Hildebrant's Pri
M
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
> - Original Message -
> From: "T Rittenhouse"
> Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
>
>
> > Don't let them fool you Ma'm they only reason they want a
> sisterhood is
> > because someone has to wash their robes and cook their
I agree Brother William, they truly cannot see us as the burning beacon
on a distant horizon, a lighthouse waiting to guild them in to the safe
harbor of the 6x7 format. Amen.
Brother Norm
William Robb wrote:
> Methinks we should not allow the puny me too users of the little
> medium format into
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 07:11 PM, T Rittenhouse wrote:
> Don't let them fool you Ma'm they only reason they want a sisterhood is
> because someone has to wash their robes and cook their gruel.
"Gruel"? Please, we eat only the finest Ho Fun with beef (or tofu for
the veggies among us)
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 04:53 PM, tom wrote:
>
> While you big fat stodgy 67ers are mumbling incantations, wearing goofy
> robes, consulting chiropractors, and hauling 50 pound packs around, us
> 645ers will be out
> shooting.
I would respond to this, but in June I am marrying a chiro
In
Amita Guha wrote:
> Me either! I have a Yashicamat EM!
>
> > Hey! Don't forget me! I have a Yashica D!
> >
> > William in Utah.
> >
> > PS. I wonder how many of us Y-M owners there are on the Pentax list
> > anyway.
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe
OTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 9:36 PM
> Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
>
> > Hey! Don't forget me! I have a Yashica D!
> >
> > William in Utah.
> >
> > PS. I wonder how many of us Y-M owners there are on the Pentax list
> > anyway.
&
Sure, William in Utah,
You're in. All ya gotta do to be in OUR club (not a cult like those
mirror-flappers) is have a Yashica tlr, and not have 'tude.
cheers,
Mat-boy
William Johnson wrote:
> Hey! Don't forget me! I have a Yashica D!
>
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all poss
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:37:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, "William
>Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hey! Don't forget me! I have a Yashica D!
> >
> > William in Utah.
> >
> > PS. I wonder how many of us Y-M owners there are on the Penta
I did find a wonderful medium format
folder last week. "Proud III"
It has the little ground glass vertical
viewer (like the very old folders) as well
as the rangefinder.
It also has alternate windows onthe back for
viewing different frame marks, and a flip-up
mask for shooting 6x4.5 or 6x6.
Real
On 19 Feb 2002 at 11:43, Norman Baugher wrote:
> I agree Brother William, they truly cannot see us as the burning
> beacon on a distant horizon, a lighthouse waiting to guild them in to
> the safe harbor of the 6x7 format.
That's not a lighthouse, that's the fiery pain of your hernia.
tv
-
Thi
ary 19, 2002 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
> On 18 Feb 2002 at 19:22, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
> >
> > ... so - bow down and pay homage! !8^)
>
> I'll be happy to shake your hand at some point.
>
> Speaking of big negs...at the wedding I did
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
> In
>
> Amita Guha wrote:
>
> > Me either! I have a Yashicamat EM!
> >
> > > Hey! Don't forget me! I have a Yashica D!
> > >
> > > Willi
I'm not sure whether that "guild" Norm wrote was supposed to be "guide" or
"geld".
Len (G, d, & r)
---
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 67 Brothe
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 04:55 PM, Robert Harris wrote:
>
> Why would an LX user want to be part of this Brotherhood of Bloat?
Now, now...where is the bloat on the 67? Sure, it's bigger than an LX,
because it takes bigger film and has that glorious prism, but compare it
to another 67
Alas, I had my hopes that the Little Brothers would realize their lot in
life and satisfied with a position, however symbolic, in the Brotherhood.
But it seems that their envy has made this impossible. I vote aye to the
P67B... long live the Brotherhood!
Brother Chris, P67B
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002
t;pentax.
>
>Ciao,
>Graywolf
>
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Bill D. Casselberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:10 PM
>Subject: Re:
You know what?
1) I've been on the list for about 3 years (off for one)..
2) I've been shooting a p67 for all of that time, rarely andy 35mm, and I'm
fed up of you newbie whippersnappers pretending you invented medium
format. I've been paying my brotherhood dues for all this time, but
wit
-
> >
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: Bill D. Casselberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:10 PM
> >Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
> >
> >
> > > Bruce
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Oliver Raymond wrote:
> 2) I've been shooting a p67 for all of that time, rarely andy 35mm, and I'm
> fed up of you newbie whippersnappers pretending you invented medium
> format. I've been paying my brotherhood dues for all this time, but
> with no recognition.
>
> 3) (
Oliver Raymond wrote:
>
>
>You know what?
>
>1) I've been on the list for about 3 years (off for one)..
>
>2) I've been shooting a p67 for all of that time, rarely andy 35mm, and
I'm
>fed up of you newbie whippersnappers pretending you invented medium
>format. I've been paying my brotherhood
I think you are getting fag and faggot confused... I'm a brit and have never
heard a cigarette called a faggot, only a fag.
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pent
Check the Dictionary, one that covers slang. The listing will be something
like this
Fag from Faggot having to do with a lit piece of wood, not the other kind.
At 06:12 PM 2/19/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>I think you are getting fag and faggot confused... I'm a brit and have never
>heard a cigarett
Wow. I've been up way too long -- 24 hours' work and 3 hours of sleep. I
thought that said Grandagon for a moment.
- Original Message -
From: "Oliver Raymond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:44 PM
Subject:
- Original Message -
From: "Oliver Raymond"
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
>
>
> You know what?
>
> 1) I've been on the list for about 3 years (off for one)..
>
> 2) I've been shooting a p67 for all of that time, rarely andy
35mm, and I'm
>
> From: "Oliver Raymond"
> I want to be the GrandDragon (or whatever yanks call their
> Brotherhood's leaders)..
Grand Poo-Bah
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Galler
could WE!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: 67 Brotherhood
>
>
> Could be gracefully end this thre
Never!
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:22 PM
Subject: RE: 67 Brotherhood
> could WE!
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 22:01:05 -0500, Robert Harris wrote:
> Or should it be the Grand Bloated Pooh Bah. :)
That depends on whether it's before or after the Grandfather Mountain
Nature Photo Weekend. :-) {with a ;^) to KG4LOV}
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List
wendy beard wrote:
>
> Come on, boys, settle down now. You're all becoming too giddy. It'll all
> end in tears, you know.
>
> What nonsense. A 67 Brotherhood.
>
> If this silliness persists, I'll just have to form my own exclusive
> association for
- Original Message -
From: "Lon Williamson"
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
> I've been thinking about a PentaX group for folks who have
35mm
> cameras with a model name ending in X. KX, MX, LX.
>
> Dues in the P_X club are a measly 200 dollars a year, mailab
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Lon Williamson"
> Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
>
>>I've been thinking about a PentaX group for folks who have
>> 35mm cameras with a model name ending in X. KX, MX, LX.
>>
>>D
Based on this post he'll cut it out for you, (err well probably for himself).
At 11:35 AM 2/21/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Lon Williamson"
>Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
>
>
>
> > I've been thinking about a PentaX group
9:50:18 AM, you wrote:
DB> What,no rung on the ladder for Y-M's
DB> Dave(sometimes 2 1/4)Brooks
DB> Begin Original Message
DB> From: Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DB> Sent: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:12:21 -0600 (CST)
DB> To: Chris Brogden &
xes. If there is a
JA> Brotherhood of the 67, I wonder how many sit at the 645 Pentax table?
JA> Jim A.
>> From: Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:12:21 -0600 (CST)
>> To: Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTE
I think we're getting kicked out before we
even sign the release papers Bill
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:24:56 -0500
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
If it'
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BO> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BO> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 3:30 PM
BO> Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
>> On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 02:48 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>> >
>> > You are right.
Yeah, were getting treated like poor cousins :-0
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "David Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [3]: 67 Brotherhood
> I think we're getting kicked out bef
- Original Message -
From: "David Brooks" <
Subject: Re: [3]: 67 Brotherhood
> I think we're getting kicked out before we
> even sign the release papers Bill
>
> Dave
Sorry Dave, but whats the point of an exclusive society if we
allow everyone in?
Brot
Hear, hear. A P67 for Mrs. Reed!
Brother Bruce
Monday, February 18, 2002, 3:20:24 PM, you wrote:
WR> - Original Message -
WR> From: Mrs. Reed
WR> Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
WR> I say Mrs. Reed needs a Pentax 6x7. What say you, Brothers of 6x7?
WR> Brother
Collin,
As a matter of fact, I am quite fond of Dr. Pepper. Wouldn't you want
to be a Pepper too?
Brother Bruce
Monday, February 18, 2002, 7:17:12 PM, you wrote:
CB> This is starting to sound more like a cult
CB> with every message reply.
CB> Pretty soon you'll all be driving VWs
CB> and d
I'm beginning to think that for the sake of the rest of us their drink of
choice
becomes cool-aid, (eeaauue that's sick).
At 07:22 PM 2/18/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Collin,
>
>As a matter of fact, I am quite fond of Dr. Pepper. Wouldn't you want
>to be a Pepper too?
>
>
>Brother Bruce
>
>
>
>Mond
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 05:49 PM, William Robb wrote:
> I say Shel Belinkoff needs to make the sacrifice of the
> pocketbook.
>
> What say you, Brothers?
I vote yay. Shel, you'll like it in the Brotherhood. There's a sense
of community and love, and best of all, BIG FREAKIN' NEGATIV
Heh Shel.Funny thing,there was one of those next ot
the Yashi67 i just bought. LOL
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:12:08 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
OK you girly-boys,
I've deci
Enought to put a scare into the Brotherhood me thinks
Dave(no flap)Brooks
Begin Original Message
From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > PS. I wonder how many of us Y-M owners there are on the Pentax
list
> > anyway.
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. T
2 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [3]: 67 Brotherhood
> On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 05:49 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> > I say Shel Belinkoff needs to make the sacrifice of the
> > pocketbook.
> >
> > What say you, Brothers?
>
> I vote yay. Shel, you'll like i
If it's a general brother hood, are we Yashica Mat users included? :-0
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Apilado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:57 PM
Subject: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 02:48 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
> You are right. We perhaps need to differentiate between the format
> and the brand. But, seeing how this is a Pentax list, I made the
> assumption that we were talking Pentax MF not Yashica's.
>
> What do the other Brothers (and
Hey, our Yashica negs are bigger than those of 645 :-0
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
> On Monday, February 18, 2002, a
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
> Hey, our Yashica negs are bigger than those of 645 :-0
>
> Bill
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: &l
e of 645 :-0
>
> BO> Bill
>
> BO> - Original Message -
> BO> From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BO> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BO> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 3:30 PM
> BO> Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
&
linkoff"
WR> Subject: Re: [3]: 67 Brotherhood
>> I think Bob Harris was close with Brotherhood of Bloat, but
WR> you guys are
>> acting more like The Bloat Brothers (with apologies to Jake
WR> and Elwood).
WR> More mean spiritedness brought on by envy!!!
WR>
Ah, but those of us who have both have the best of both worlds! :)
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
> Hey, our Yashica negs are big
AIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:27:45 -0600
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Reynolds" <
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
> I say that David should buy a Pentax 67.
I second this.
Does the Bro
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 03:57 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
> Big Bruce
This is, of course, one of the slogans of Bruce County, in Northern
Ontario. I may have a "Big Bruce" T-shirt hanging around somewhere...
-Big Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscrib
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 04:27 PM, T Rittenhouse wrote:
> Can those who use an LX be little bitty brothers?
That honour is reserved for owners of the ME Super. LXers are Slightly
Less Bitty Brothers.
-BB Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go t
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 06:27 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Hear, hear. A P67 for Mrs. Reed!
I truly believe, deep in my soul, that Mrs. Reed's quality of life would
be greatly increased by a Pentax 67.
Think, Mrs. Reed, that by spending $1000 or less you could increase the
quality of
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 09:46 PM, Peter Alling wrote,
regarding moose hats:
> Be careful in the woods during hunting season.
...or on the road. 0.1% of all motor vehicle accidents in Canada
involve a moose.
-Aaron
keeper of true facts
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Yeah, I think we are gonna need to broaden the Brotherhood a bit.
> Include 645 and need to decide if this is a general brotherhood or a
> Pentax brotherhood.
Barely into the fold and already suggesting changes, eh Brother Bruce?
645 users are always we
I say so to.Liz(the SO) get in here and read this
They have spoken
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:30:04 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 02:48 PM,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Bill Owens wrote:
> Hey, our Yashica negs are bigger than those of 645 :-0
But you have lost your way and are toying with the Dark Side of MedF.
Return to the Pentax Medium Format Brotherhood and all shall be
forgiven... in time.
Brother Chris
-
This message is from the Pen
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Perhaps we go with those with 67's are Big Brothers and those with
> 645's are Little Brothers.
Well said, Big Bruce! Verily you have spoken great wisdom, and shall
hereby be declared exempt from the one-lens registration fee.
BB Chris
-
This message
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DB> Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
DB> - Original Message -----
DB> From: "Aaron Reynolds" <
DB> Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
>> I say that David should buy a Pentax 67.
DB> I second this.
DB> Does the Brotherh
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: 67 Brotherhood
> Hey! Don't forget me! I have a Yashica D!
>
> William in Utah.
>
> PS. I wonder how many of us Y-M owners there are on the Pentax list
> anyway.
>
> frank theriault wrote:
> >
> >
The rest of the accidents involve "meeses"
Dave(losser of facts)
Begin Original Message
From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:23:58 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 09:46
Ummm
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:14:43 -0800
To: David Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Does this count:67 Brotherhood
David,
Boy, that looks like some new-fangled stereo
camera. What ar
In
"JeffW." wrote:
> on 2/19/02 3:59 AM, Bill Owens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Let's see, there's you, Dave, Frank and myself that admit to it. I actually
> > have 2, a 635 w/o the 35mm adapter and a 124G that has problems accepting
> > 220 film
> >
> > Bill
>
> You can add me to the lis
Esteemed members of the brotherhood,
(As I lay down my puny small-format bodies and take my shoes off to stand in
your presence)
What say ye about mirror lock-up bodies -- specifically, which ones have it
and which don't? My guess is that bodies marked "67" do not. Do all bodies
marked "6x
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
> (As I lay down my puny small-format bodies and take my shoes off to stand in
> your presence)
BOW YOUR HEADS!
> What say ye about mirror lock-up bodies -- specifically, which ones have it
> and which don't? My guess is that bodies mark
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, dave o'brien wrote:
> If you're looking at a body, and the shutter is cocked, pushing up on the
> switch will lock up the mirror. It can only be release by pushing the
> shutter release or pushing the reset switch (that's the little recessed
> doodad).
I forgot to add: t
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, dave o'brien wrote:
> The shutter release is on the body part, *not* the mirror box, and is a
> small circular recessed button. You can't push it by mistake.
*aaargh!* I shouldn't be posting. That's the mirror lockup release
and reset button, not the shutter release
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
> Esteemed members of the brotherhood,
>
> (As I lay down my puny small-format bodies and take my shoes off to stand in
> your presence)
All as it should be...
> What say ye about mirror lock-up bodies -- specifically, which ones have it
>
dave o'brien wrote:
> If you're looking at a body, and the shutter is cocked, pushing up on
> the switch will lock up the mirror. It can only be release by pushing
> the shutter release or pushing the reset switch (that's the little
> recessed doodad).
The "reset" switch does not release the m
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
> I now turn my gaze away from the large bodies -- especially Casselberry's
> 6x9 -- for fear of turning into a pillar of silver bromide ;-)
The first time I read that, I read it as Casselberry's body being large...
But the second time, w
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
