Well i suppose i can bring the film in and run a way fast
likeg
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:11:29 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 67 enabling run rampant, was Re: Unenable me, please!
On Monday, March 25
On Tuesday, March 26, 2002, at 09:53 AM, David Brooks wrote:
Well i suppose i can bring the film in and run a way fast
likeg
You can try...but you won't escape the magnetic pull of the 67...
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 02:27 PM, Fred wrote:
You've obviously sent this plea to the wrong mailing list by
mistake, Paul.
Here's an example of rampant enabling run wild --
A photographer spent the day in our lab on Sunday, approving big
watercolour prints for a somewhat rush job.
Aaron,
Way to go! I use the 165/2.8 for portraits and like it very much. To
get tight head shots I do have to attach the extension tube #1.
Brother Bruce
Monday, March 25, 2002, 12:34:29 PM, you wrote:
AR On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 02:27 PM, Fred wrote:
You've obviously sent this
On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 04:09 PM, David Brooks wrote:
Thats why i'm afraid to bring the IR film in.You
might have the 67 there.:)
Sheesh, Dave, why would I NOT have the 67 there? ;)
I should sell these things...maybe time to call Pentax again and bug 'em.
-Aaron
-
This message is
enabling run rampant, was Re: Unenable me, please!
Thats why i'm afraid to bring the IR film in.You
might have the 67 there.:)
Dave:)
Begin Original Message
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 15:34:29 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 67
On 25 Mar 2002 at 15:34, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
He's also interested in lenses in
the 150mm range, for portraiture...do any of our Brothers have
favourites?
For portraits definintely the 165 F4 LS for me.
Haven't bought mine yet (soon though) so I can't
remember whether or not an extension
Aaron carrying 67's? oh no run run away
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, March 25, 2002, at 04:09 PM, David
Brooks wrote:
Thats why i'm afraid to bring the IR film in.You
might have the 67 there.:)
Sheesh, Dave, why would I NOT have the 67 there? ;)
I
The portrait lens of choice has to be the 165/4 leaf shutter. Particularly
if he wants to use fill flash in outdoor settings. Of course the 150/2.8 is
a very good lens, and can be had at very good prices. BTW, a nice 6z7 was
sitting at about $250 and no reserve this afternoon with just a couple
The 165/4LS focuses to 5.1 feet, which leaves you with a head and
shoulders. Just about right for most portraits.
Paul
Brian Campbell (PM) wrote:
On 25 Mar 2002 at 15:34, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
He's also interested in lenses in
the 150mm range, for portraiture...do any of our Brothers have
10 matches
Mail list logo
