RE: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D

2007-01-24 Thread J. C. O'Connell
open lens which of couse would make all the tests meaningless ? ? ? jco -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:58 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: A test of meter/exposure calibration

Re: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D

2007-01-24 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
JCO Listen, you mindless nincompoop, the comment I made with regard to variation and body controlled aperture setting is expressed in exactly these words: > The remaining four rows show what the in-camera reflective meter > nets at the same aperture settings ... first two using the body >

Re: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D

2007-01-24 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D > What is "allowed" by the mfgr. and what is acceptable to the > photographer is two different things of course. 1/3 stop may be f

RE: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D

2007-01-24 Thread David Savage
Whoops. Sorry. Dave At 12:47 PM 25/01/2007, J. C. O'Connell wrote: >NO, you misunderstood my reply, he specifically stated >he was getting exposure variations with the lens aperture >set by the BODY in his "control" tests and also stated >it was being caused by metering sensitivity limitations >

RE: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D

2007-01-24 Thread J. C. O'Connell
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D - Original Message - From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D > When you use any lens on "A" set

RE: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D

2007-01-24 Thread J. C. O'Connell
r/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D John, read what Godfrey wrote: "I've read on DPReview.com many people saying that metering with pre-A series lenses was off in the K10D" Godfrey doesn't own any pre "A" lenses, so he was testing them off the "A&quo

RE: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D

2007-01-24 Thread David Savage
John, read what Godfrey wrote: "I've read on DPReview.com many people saying that metering with pre-A series lenses was off in the K10D" Godfrey doesn't own any pre "A" lenses, so he was testing them off the "A" position to mimic how K & M lenses behave when taking meter readings on the K10D.

Re: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D

2007-01-24 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D > When you use any lens on "A" setting, and set > aperture with the body, there shouldnt > be any variation with fstop related to m

RE: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D

2007-01-24 Thread J. C. O'Connell
L PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:36 PM To: PDML List Subject: A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D Text at http://homepage.mac.com/godd

A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D

2007-01-24 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
A test of meter/exposure calibration between *ist DS and K10D Text at http://homepage.mac.com/godders/mCAL/calibration-K10-DS.txt I've read on DPReview.com many people saying that metering with pre-A series lenses was off in the K10D. I only have one such lens and don't use it