Re: another test - I THINK I'm back

Where did you go? Someplace warm I hope… stan > On Jan 6, 2017, at 6:23 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > > sigh... > > ann > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit

Re: another test - I THINK I'm back

You're here...=-O -p On 1/6/2017 5:23 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: sigh... ann -- Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly

Re: Another test - Pixel Shift

On 1/6/2017 3:03 PM, Brian Walters wrote: Interesting comparisons. I see a small but noticeable improvement in detail in Image 3 compared with image 1. If I recall correctly, Ricoh's implementation of pixel shift produces images with the same pixel dimensions as a 'normal' image but with

Re: Another test - Pixel Shift

On 1/5/2017 11:00 PM, Stanley Halpin wrote: Been done before I am sure. I had heard since forever that LR could not take advantage of pixel-shifted files from the K-3ii or K-1. But I saw a discussion recently that implied to me that LR did work. As part of my recent look at the Leica-M adapter

another test - I THINK I'm back

sigh... ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Another test - Pixel Shift

Larry Colen wrote: Or you could pretend that it's the 21st century and just download the software from here: http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/english/support/download_digital.html Oops my bad, those seem to be only for the Q Mac:

Re: Another test - Pixel Shift

Stanley Halpin wrote: Been done before I am sure. I had heard since forever that LR could not take advantage of pixel-shifted files from the K-3ii or K-1. But I saw a discussion recently that implied to me that LR did work. As part of my recent look at the Leica-M adapter for K mount, I shot

Re: Another test - Pixel Shift

Interesting comparisons. I see a small but noticeable improvement in detail in Image 3 compared with image 1. If I recall correctly, Ricoh's implementation of pixel shift produces images with the same pixel dimensions as a 'normal' image but with increased detail. This contrasts with the Olympus

Another test - Pixel Shift

Been done before I am sure. I had heard since forever that LR could not take advantage of pixel-shifted files from the K-3ii or K-1. But I saw a discussion recently that implied to me that LR did work. As part of my recent look at the Leica-M adapter for K mount, I shot some of the images with

Re: Another test

On 5/9/2016 12:34 PM, Chris Mitchell wrote: Trying to donate, but get the message "Your request failed due to technical difficulties. Please try again after some time". It happened on Mark's book donation page too. I waited some time (24 hours) and it still happens. Has anyone else seen the

Re: Another test

I tried to convert a portion of yourmsgand Mail said “you want Rich Text?” I said sure. Sent the reply. Got this notice from mailbox-owner: "The message's content type was not explicitly allowed” stan > On May 9, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Stanley Halpin > wrote: > >>

Re: Another test (for Chris)

Thanks Stan! Taken as a generous offer. I suspect it's related to the "donate" button so I'll try sending it directly to Doug first. CM On 9 May 2016 at 19:43, Stanley Halpin wrote: > Try sending me the money and if it comes through I will send it on. > That is a

Re: Another test (for Chris)

Try sending me the money and if it comes through I will send it on. That is a serious offer BTW… Paypal address is the same I use on PDML. stan > On May 9, 2016, at 2:34 PM, Chris Mitchell wrote: > > Trying to donate, but get the message "Your request failed due to >

Re: Another test

Ambiguous result using iPhone Gmail app: I see the message in this thread, but I also got a reply on my phone saying "The message's content type was not explicitly allowed." Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > Can it now

Re: Another test

Trying to donate, but get the message "Your request failed due to technical difficulties. Please try again after some time". It happened on Mark's book donation page too. I waited some time (24 hours) and it still happens. Has anyone else seen the same? I want to donate! Chris On 9 May 2016 at

Re: Another test

Nope. At least gmail is smart enough to recognize that it needs to respond to threads with plain text. Its when I compose a new message that it reverts to formatted. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: > Gonz, did you send that with formatted text? >

Re: Another test

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: > Hi, kids. > > > Now might be a good time to remind you to throw some cash into the PDML > kitty, since it is currently as empty as campaign promises. > > much love, > > Doug Done > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail

Re: Another test

Doug Brewer wrote: Now might be a good time to remind you to throw some cash into the PDML kitty, since it is currently as empty as campaign promises. Done. much love, Doug There's nothing in this world quite like love from Doug Brewer. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox

Re: Another test

Gonz, did you send that with formatted text? On 5/9/16 1:20 PM, Gonz wrote: No wonder my posts never make it. I forget to put the "plain-text" mode in gmail. It defaults to formatted. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: Hi, kids. Basically, what

Re: Another test

Looks nicely plain to moi - ann On 5/9/2016 1:17 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: Hi, kids. Basically, what Mark and I are trying to accomplish is to accept formatted text and convert it to plain text in order to send on to The List. That way, those of you with email clients that revert to or can

Re: Another test

It came through without a hitch, Doug. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: > Hi, kids. > > Basically, what Mark and I are trying to accomplish is to accept formatted > text and convert it to

Re: Another test

replying in plain text... whichever is the fastest.. Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com On 9 May 2016 20:18:57 Doug Brewer wrote: Hi, kids. Basically, what Mark and I are trying to accomplish is to accept formatted text and convert it to

Re: Another test

No wonder my posts never make it. I forget to put the "plain-text" mode in gmail. It defaults to formatted. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: > Hi, kids. > > Basically, what Mark and I are trying to accomplish is to accept formatted > text and

Another test

Hi, kids. Basically, what Mark and I are trying to accomplish is to accept formatted text and convert it to plain text in order to send on to The List. That way, those of you with email clients that revert to or can only compose in formatted text can still post your messages and they won't

Okay another test..

Haven't tried to do a new msg with iOS 8.1.1... Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Okay another test..

Yay! It works now. :-) Godfrey -- On Dec 6, 2014, at 7:15 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote: Haven't tried to do a new msg with iOS 8.1.1... Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the

Yet another Test.

Dammit. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Another test of new mail

The past few messages failed. More of the same? -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow

Re: Another test of new mail

None of them (3) failed to make it to my Mail program Larry. On Apr 3, 2013, at 23:31 , Larry Colen wrote: The past few messages failed. More of the same? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Re: Another test of new mail

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013, Larry Colen wrote: The past few messages failed. More of the same? Are you going through Google in any way? If yes, it's possible Google isn't showing you the messages (I've noticed that in the past). -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

Re: Another test of new mail

One msg last night about testing your new phone, two this morning re some new software, then this one. If there were others, I didn't see them. On Apr 4, 2013, at 2:31 AM, Larry Colen wrote: The past few messages failed. More of the same? -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail.

Re: Another test of new mail

Stan, And if there were no others, - did you see them? ;-) Which reminds me an old joke: Programmer's wife tells him what to buy at the store: Please buy a loaf of bread, and if there are fresh eggs, - buy a dozen. The guy comes back with a dozen loafs of bread. Wife: - Why did you buy this

Re: Another test of new mail

Makes sense to me - I used to speak Fortran. smh On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote: Stan, And if there were no others, - did you see them? ;-) Which reminds me an old joke: Programmer's wife tells him what to buy at the store: Please buy a loaf of bread, and if there are

Re: Another test of new mail

Makes sense to me - I used to speak Fortran. Looking forward to when my odometer reads 377377 so I can call it Heath. (It will be a while. 17 is about 2 years away.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,

Re: More connectivity problems just another test

Nothing really. But you still looked. David J Brooks wrote: At what On 6/15/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bawhahaha. Got you to look. -- All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: More connectivity problems just another test

At what On 6/15/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bawhahaha. Got you to look. -- All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- Equine Photography

More connectivity problems just another test

Bawhahaha. Got you to look. -- All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

another test - ignore

Plain text I hope now and perhaps success at last! Alastair -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: another test - ignore

On 1/11/07 6:28 PM, Alastair Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Plain text I hope now and perhaps success at last! PDML ignores nothing. Ken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: another test - ignore

Ack, ignored. Alastair Robertson skribenen: Plain text I hope now and perhaps success at last! Alastair -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

another test please ignore this one too

Photographers are voyeurs, I knew that. :-) Jostein

Re: another test please ignore this one too

Caught me! 8-0 Didn't you know that tests always get through? (Maybe we should always include the word test with our posts). Jack --- Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Photographers are voyeurs, I knew that. :-) Jostein __ Do You

Re: another test please ignore this one too

, May 17, 2006 9:42 PM Subject: Re: another test please ignore this one too Caught me! 8-0 Didn't you know that tests always get through? (Maybe we should always include the word test with our posts). Jack --- Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Photographers are voyeurs, I knew

yet another test

Sorry, but I never received the digest with my last two tests Butch ¢ © µ

Re: yet another test

These came through Ok Butch. John Coyle Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 9:12 AM Subject: yet another test Sorry, but I never received the digest with my last two tests Butch

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

Today I got to look at my own page from two TFT monitors (an LG and a ViewSonic). On the LG, the CA is hardly visible at all. It's there, but the colour is very inconspicuous. Looks like you are very much right about the fringing being a monitor thing. Interestingly, the more contrasty TFTs also

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

Thanks Jostein. That's good to know. On Apr 4, 2005, at 6:29 AM, Jostein wrote: Today I got to look at my own page from two TFT monitors (an LG and a ViewSonic). On the LG, the CA is hardly visible at all. It's there, but the colour is very inconspicuous. Looks like you are very much right about

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

On 4 Apr 2005 at 12:29, Jostein wrote: Today I got to look at my own page from two TFT monitors (an LG and a ViewSonic). On the LG, the CA is hardly visible at all. It's there, but the colour is very inconspicuous. Looks like you are very much right about the fringing being a monitor thing.

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Jostein wrote: IMHO, there are only two samples that qualify as useless mush; the FA* 28-70/2.8 at 28mm and the A645/2.8, both at full opening. I am not a great photographer, but these would be useless even for me. I know nothing about the A645, but with the FA* I am really

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

Monday, April 4, 2005, 9:28:06 PM, Kostas wrote: KK On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Jostein wrote: IMHO, there are only two samples that qualify as useless mush; the FA* 28-70/2.8 at 28mm and the A645/2.8, both at full opening. KK I am not a great photographer, but these would be useless even for me. KK

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 9:28 PM Subject: Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Jostein wrote: IMHO, there are only two samples that qualify as useless mush; the FA* 28-70/2.8 at 28mm and the A645/2.8, both at full opening. I am

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Jostein wrote: Kostas, I don't know. I have never done a similar test on film. And, I'm bery unlikely to use any wide angle lens on full opening at any rate, so the thought has simply not occurred to me before. :-( No need to frown (:-(). I would be quite pleased to note

Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

Hi gang, With all the interesting tests performed with the new wide angle DA lenses to the older workhorses of the Pentax lineup, I felt like it was my turn to contribute to the pool. I bought the DA 16-45 for my trip to Israel about a month ago, and found the zoom range so convenient that it

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

Good work. The 31 Limited is obviously superb, even at 2.8. I'm surprised at how well the DA 16-45 stacks up at f8. It appears to be better than both the 20/2.8 and the FA* 28-70 and a near match for the 31 Limited. It's also decent at F4. On the basis of this, I'm thinking I don't need the

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

the FA is much better than the DA wrt. fringing. Jostein - Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 2:05 PM Subject: Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass Good work. The 31 Limited

RE: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass Hi gang, With all the interesting tests performed with the new wide angle DA lenses to the older workhorses of the Pentax lineup, I felt like it was my turn to contribute to the pool. I bought the DA 16-45 for my trip to Israel

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

, but in this scene I would say the FA is much better than the DA wrt. fringing. Jostein - Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 2:05 PM Subject: Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass Good work. The 31

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

apertures. Jostein - Original Message - From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 3:10 PM Subject: RE: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass An excellent comparison Jostein, much more 'scientific' than mine. 2 questions: 1

RE: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

have to repeat the exercise for this lens with all apertures. Jostein - Original Message - From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 3:10 PM Subject: RE: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 3:10 PM Subject: RE: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass An excellent comparison Jostein, much more 'scientific' than mine. -Original Message- From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

: Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass Hmmm, even with my reading glasses on I don't see anything that I would call fringing on most of the shots. I see some minor difference in color rendering. The only place I see something that I would call fringing is on the FA 20/2.8

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

@pdml.net Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 4:40 PM Subject: Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass Jostein wrote: Don, 1. In the photoshop settings, set units rulers to show as pixels. Then you can use the info pane to gauge the exact size of your selection. Once the size

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 4:40 PM Subject: Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass Jostein wrote: Don, 1. In the photoshop settings, set units rulers to show as pixels. Then you can use the info pane to gauge the exact size of your selection. Once

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

there was enough of a break in the rain to run out and do a quick and dirty set of photos with 6 lenses: Sigma 12-24/4.5-5.6, DA 14/2.8, DA 16-45/4, 31/1.8 Limited, FA* 24/2, and FA* 28-70/2.8. if i had time, i should have tried the FA 24-90/3.5-4.5 too. it's too late now. you can see selected

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

On 3 Apr 2005 at 8:05, Paul Stenquist wrote: On the basis of this, I'm thinking I don't need the 20/2.8. That f-stop would be nice, but it appears to be an f-stop that I wouldn't want to use. I'm speaking only in regard to perceived sharpness. On these web images, I can't really judge CA.

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

Rod Opined: CA is visible to me and the the zoom appears pretty poor compared to the A20, Uh, the A20 wide open created nothing but useless mush. And it was only mediocre at the other stops. As far as CA is concerned, I can't see it, Herb can't see it. It must not be very extreme, or

Re: Another test of DA 16-45/4 against other Pentax glass

On 3 Apr 2005 at 23:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rod Opined: CA is visible to me and the the zoom appears pretty poor compared to the A20, Uh, the A20 wide open created nothing but useless mush. And it was only mediocre at the other stops. As far as CA is concerned, I can't see

Another test. Do not read

failed again

Re: Another test. Do not read

In a message dated 3/19/2005 4:03:11 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: failed again === And why is it, when it says do not read, I always do? Hehehe. Marnie

Re: Another test. Do not read

Marnie, It's the same mechanism as Don't look down It's too your right.no, your other right., people are just contrary. :-) BTW Bill, I have to read it to know not to read it s... :-) Dave S On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:09:05 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message

OT: Another test

Seems like I got kicked out from the list... Testing if I am back. --- Antti-Pekka Virjonen Computec Oy, Turku Finland Gsm: +358-500-789 753 www.computec.fi * www.estera.fi

RE: Another test

: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 8:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Another test Seems like I got kicked out from the list... Testing if I am back.

another test

Seems I got subscribed to the digest (just got one, and saw my previous test). I wanna be on the list. Just re-subscribed again. Let's see what happens. Is this a plot by the pro-gun lobby? vbg -frank -- The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is

Re: another test

Frank, You're able to post again. Hope you get two copies of this mail...:-) Jostein - Original Message - From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 5:36 PM Subject: another test Seems I got subscribed to the digest (just got one

another test... ignore

Jostein http://oksne.net - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

OT: Another Test, Please Ignore Again

Hey there, Another test from a different site. Joined the Yahoo's so that I can vent on the list. Goodbye Excite. Did I say I bought a GIII QL17 canonet at a good price? Not on the PDML! Say, that efke 25 looked really nice on my monitor. dave Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo