At 01:07 PM 10/08/2006, you wrote:
I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988.
That makes me feel pretty shallow.
I spent most of 84'-88' sitting on the back of a boat drinking Flaming
Lamborghinis, listening to Depeche Mode
On Aug 10, 2006, at 12:02 AM, David Savage wrote:
I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988.
That makes me feel pretty shallow.
I spent most of 84'-88' sitting on the back of a boat drinking
Flaming
Lamborghinis,
At 04:21 PM 10/08/2006, you wrote:
On Aug 10, 2006, at 12:02 AM, David Savage wrote:
I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988.
That makes me feel pretty shallow.
I spent most of 84'-88' sitting on the back of a boat
I've read a few months ago about a PS camera that features such
software shake reduction. The camera movement (kernel) is detected
by actual accelerometers just like with hardware AS, but the shake
correction is not done physically through lens or sensor position
control, but by an embedded
Doug Franklin wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Perhaps it could be reverse engineered to *add* authentic simulated
camera shake to photos that don't already have it!
Or I could hand Frank my camera. ;-
I think the reciprocal of Nyquist frequency should be dubbed the
Theriault frequency. Surely it
I think the Fuji F30 has that kind of system in it. I'll know more on
Friday when mine arrives.
Godfrey
On Aug 10, 2006, at 3:09 AM, Patrice LACOUTURE wrote:
I've read a few months ago about a PS camera that features such
software shake reduction. The camera movement (kernel) is detected
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:02:11PM +0800, David Savage wrote:
At 01:07 PM 10/08/2006, you wrote:
I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988.
That makes me feel pretty shallow.
I spent most of 84'-88' sitting on the back
Let's see...grades 2-6...that would have been 1948-52. :}
-P
David Savage wrote:
You guy's are making me feel really young.
'84-'88 were grades 2-6 for me.
:-)
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Mark Roberts wrote:
I think the reciprocal of Nyquist frequency should be dubbed the
Theriault frequency. Surely it plays an important role in
establishing proper blur?
;-)
It's probably the Theriaultian Golden Mean or some such. :-)
(Just wait until Frank gets back from vacation and
On Aug 9, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Cotty wrote:
Yeah, and he also made a mean cup of tea as well.
I'm glad to have multiple talents. ]'-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Software-based anti-shake that works on photos you've already taken:
http://news.com.com/Researchers+take+the+blur+out+of+shaky+photos/2100-1041_3-6102910.html?tag=nefd.lede
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Mark Roberts wrote:
Software-based anti-shake that works on photos you've already taken:
http://news.com.com/Researchers+take+the+blur+out+of+shaky+photos/2100-1041_3-6102910.html?tag=nefd.lede
This is really awesome!
I look forward to a mature product!
keith whaley
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
keith_w wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Software-based anti-shake that works on photos you've already taken:
http://news.com.com/Researchers+take+the+blur+out+of+shaky+photos/2100-1041_3-6102910.html?tag=nefd.lede
This is really awesome!
I look forward to a mature product!
Although most miracle
On Aug 9, 2006, at 9:31 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Software-based anti-shake that works on photos you've already taken:
http://news.com.com/Researchers+take+the+blur+out+of+shaky+photos/
2100-1041_3-6102910.html?tag=nefd.lede
This is really awesome!
I look forward to a mature product!
Den 9. aug. 2006 kl. 19.09 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi:
Part of my work on imaging correlators for Synthetic Aperture Radar
remote sensors included development of motion compensating algorithms
that lead in this direction. That was 20 years ago, and neither
computing power nor the mathematical
DagT wrote:
Den 9. aug. 2006 kl. 19.09 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi:
Part of my work on imaging correlators for Synthetic Aperture Radar
remote sensors included development of motion compensating algorithms
that lead in this direction.
For whom was this work done, please?
keith whaley
Once a
Roberts
Sendt: 9. august 2006 13:40
Til: pdml@pdml.net
Emne: Anti-shake, after the fact
Software-based anti-shake that works on photos you've already taken:
http://news.com.com/Researchers+take+the+blur+out+of+shaky+photos/2100-1041_
3-6102910.html?tag=nefd.lede
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:23 AM, keith_w wrote:
Part of my work on imaging correlators for Synthetic Aperture Radar
remote sensors included development of motion compensating
algorithms
that lead in this direction.
For whom was this work done, please?
keith whaley
Once a mechanical
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:23 AM, keith_w wrote:
Part of my work on imaging correlators for Synthetic Aperture Radar
remote sensors included development of motion compensating
algorithms that lead in this direction.
For whom was this work done, please?
keith whaley
On 9/8/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in the RADAR
Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988.
I was involved with the Aircraft SAR Shuttle Underflight experiments,
SIR-B and SIR-C shuttle imaging radar projects, the
The full paper, plus matlab source code, can be found here:
http://people.csail.mit.edu/fergus/research/deblur.html
I was in Boston for SIGGRAPH last week, but didn't attend this talk,
as I was at a different session. Interesting results, I'll read the
paper and see how easy it would be to
Jens Bladt wrote:
Every photographer and photodealer/-printer will
want this software :-)
Except Frank.
:-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Doug Franklin wrote:
Jens Bladt wrote:
Every photographer and photodealer/-printer will
want this software :-)
Except Frank.
Perhaps it could be reverse engineered to *add* authentic simulated
camera shake to photos that don't already have it!
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
Mark Roberts wrote:
Perhaps it could be reverse engineered to *add* authentic simulated
camera shake to photos that don't already have it!
Or I could hand Frank my camera. ;-
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
that's what I remember...
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Thursday, 10 August 2006 2:59 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Anti-shake, after the fact
On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:23 AM, keith_w wrote:
Part
25 matches
Mail list logo