RE: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-10 Thread David Savage
At 01:07 PM 10/08/2006, you wrote: I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988. That makes me feel pretty shallow. I spent most of 84'-88' sitting on the back of a boat drinking Flaming Lamborghinis, listening to Depeche Mode

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-10 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Aug 10, 2006, at 12:02 AM, David Savage wrote: I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988. That makes me feel pretty shallow. I spent most of 84'-88' sitting on the back of a boat drinking Flaming Lamborghinis,

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-10 Thread David Savage
At 04:21 PM 10/08/2006, you wrote: On Aug 10, 2006, at 12:02 AM, David Savage wrote: I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988. That makes me feel pretty shallow. I spent most of 84'-88' sitting on the back of a boat

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-10 Thread Patrice LACOUTURE
I've read a few months ago about a PS camera that features such software shake reduction. The camera movement (kernel) is detected by actual accelerometers just like with hardware AS, but the shake correction is not done physically through lens or sensor position control, but by an embedded

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-10 Thread Mark Roberts
Doug Franklin wrote: Mark Roberts wrote: Perhaps it could be reverse engineered to *add* authentic simulated camera shake to photos that don't already have it! Or I could hand Frank my camera. ;- I think the reciprocal of Nyquist frequency should be dubbed the Theriault frequency. Surely it

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-10 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
I think the Fuji F30 has that kind of system in it. I'll know more on Friday when mine arrives. Godfrey On Aug 10, 2006, at 3:09 AM, Patrice LACOUTURE wrote: I've read a few months ago about a PS camera that features such software shake reduction. The camera movement (kernel) is detected

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-10 Thread John Francis
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:02:11PM +0800, David Savage wrote: At 01:07 PM 10/08/2006, you wrote: I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988. That makes me feel pretty shallow. I spent most of 84'-88' sitting on the back

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-10 Thread Paul Sorenson
Let's see...grades 2-6...that would have been 1948-52. :} -P David Savage wrote: You guy's are making me feel really young. '84-'88 were grades 2-6 for me. :-) Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-10 Thread Doug Franklin
Mark Roberts wrote: I think the reciprocal of Nyquist frequency should be dubbed the Theriault frequency. Surely it plays an important role in establishing proper blur? ;-) It's probably the Theriaultian Golden Mean or some such. :-) (Just wait until Frank gets back from vacation and

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-10 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Aug 9, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Cotty wrote: Yeah, and he also made a mean cup of tea as well. I'm glad to have multiple talents. ]'-) G -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread Mark Roberts
Software-based anti-shake that works on photos you've already taken: http://news.com.com/Researchers+take+the+blur+out+of+shaky+photos/2100-1041_3-6102910.html?tag=nefd.lede -- Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com 412-687-2835 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread keith_w
Mark Roberts wrote: Software-based anti-shake that works on photos you've already taken: http://news.com.com/Researchers+take+the+blur+out+of+shaky+photos/2100-1041_3-6102910.html?tag=nefd.lede This is really awesome! I look forward to a mature product! keith whaley -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread Mark Roberts
keith_w wrote: Mark Roberts wrote: Software-based anti-shake that works on photos you've already taken: http://news.com.com/Researchers+take+the+blur+out+of+shaky+photos/2100-1041_3-6102910.html?tag=nefd.lede This is really awesome! I look forward to a mature product! Although most miracle

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Aug 9, 2006, at 9:31 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: Software-based anti-shake that works on photos you've already taken: http://news.com.com/Researchers+take+the+blur+out+of+shaky+photos/ 2100-1041_3-6102910.html?tag=nefd.lede This is really awesome! I look forward to a mature product!

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread DagT
Den 9. aug. 2006 kl. 19.09 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi: Part of my work on imaging correlators for Synthetic Aperture Radar remote sensors included development of motion compensating algorithms that lead in this direction. That was 20 years ago, and neither computing power nor the mathematical

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread keith_w
DagT wrote: Den 9. aug. 2006 kl. 19.09 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi: Part of my work on imaging correlators for Synthetic Aperture Radar remote sensors included development of motion compensating algorithms that lead in this direction. For whom was this work done, please? keith whaley Once a

RE: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread Jens Bladt
Roberts Sendt: 9. august 2006 13:40 Til: pdml@pdml.net Emne: Anti-shake, after the fact Software-based anti-shake that works on photos you've already taken: http://news.com.com/Researchers+take+the+blur+out+of+shaky+photos/2100-1041_ 3-6102910.html?tag=nefd.lede -- Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:23 AM, keith_w wrote: Part of my work on imaging correlators for Synthetic Aperture Radar remote sensors included development of motion compensating algorithms that lead in this direction. For whom was this work done, please? keith whaley Once a mechanical

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread keith_w
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:23 AM, keith_w wrote: Part of my work on imaging correlators for Synthetic Aperture Radar remote sensors included development of motion compensating algorithms that lead in this direction. For whom was this work done, please? keith whaley

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread Cotty
On 9/8/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: I was employed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in the RADAR Science and Technology group from 1984 to 1988. I was involved with the Aircraft SAR Shuttle Underflight experiments, SIR-B and SIR-C shuttle imaging radar projects, the

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread Juan Buhler
The full paper, plus matlab source code, can be found here: http://people.csail.mit.edu/fergus/research/deblur.html I was in Boston for SIGGRAPH last week, but didn't attend this talk, as I was at a different session. Interesting results, I'll read the paper and see how easy it would be to

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread Doug Franklin
Jens Bladt wrote: Every photographer and photodealer/-printer will want this software :-) Except Frank. :-) -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread Mark Roberts
Doug Franklin wrote: Jens Bladt wrote: Every photographer and photodealer/-printer will want this software :-) Except Frank. Perhaps it could be reverse engineered to *add* authentic simulated camera shake to photos that don't already have it! -- Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia

Re: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread Doug Franklin
Mark Roberts wrote: Perhaps it could be reverse engineered to *add* authentic simulated camera shake to photos that don't already have it! Or I could hand Frank my camera. ;- -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

RE: Anti-shake, after the fact

2006-08-09 Thread Simon King
that's what I remember... Simon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: Thursday, 10 August 2006 2:59 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Anti-shake, after the fact On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:23 AM, keith_w wrote: Part