Crazy idea:
Couple the IS optical train with a negative element (all in body) and then
couldn't you put a full-frame image on a non-full frame image sensor?
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Alan Chan wrote:
Could it be that they are working on image stabilization within the body of
the camera that will
Could it be that they are working on image stabilization within the body of
the camera that will work with all current and not-so-current lenses?
Just speculation.
C
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
I see that the Pentax patent is similar to Nikon's implementation of the IS
feature. This means that it should work at approximately one stop slower
shutter speed than Canon's IS - about three stop worth is gained as opposed
to Canon's two.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
All,
Here's another cool patent that was awarded today. It's US Patent Number
6,374,048 for Device for correcting a tremble of a focused image. The
drawings for this one are also very detailed, indicating that they actually
built it
--Mark
4 matches
Mail list logo
