Damn, when I saw this title, I thought, "OK, well
could I have $8000 please?"
:P
Brian
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
Go for the SMC Tak 105/2.8 or the SMC Tak 85/1.8 if your looking for
something in the portrait lens range. The 85/1.8 is somewhat pricey
($300 or so) but may well be the best screwmount lens of them all. The
105/2.8 usually goes for $140 or so. In longer lenses, the SMC Tak 300/4
is excellent and
Ted Bradshaw wrote:
> My only Pentax equipment (so far anyway) is an old Spotmatic and a 50/1.4,
> However, I would ask your collective Worships which of the M42 SMC Takumars
> you would particularly recommend that I buy next. (I am thinking in terms of
> those lenses that you see as offering the
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Ted Bradshaw wrote:
> However, I would ask your collective Worships which of the M42 SMC
> Takumars you would particularly recommend that I buy next. (I am
> thinking in terms of those lenses that you see as offering the very
> best optical performance.)
Ha ha ha... what a f
> However, I would ask your collective Worships which of the M42 SMC
> Takumars you would particularly recommend that I buy next.
The 1.8/85mm, definitely. It is brilliant!
And I have heard good things about the 2.0/35mm.
Best wishes
Wieland
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mai
Chris Brogden wrote:
>
> I'm still waiting for a GLC (Grumpy Lens Curmudgeon) to jump in and remind
> us that all we *really* need is an old Spotmatic with the 55/1.8
And here I am! Well, almost!!
My only Pentax equipment (so far anyway) is an old Spotmatic and a 50/1.4,
and frequently I go out
6 matches
Mail list logo
