Re: PESO Swirling bokeh and a stork

That is a fine avian portrait, Toine! Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery <https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery>* On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 4:04 PM Toine wrote: > Bright sunshine and a very long focal length produces swirling air and > bokeh. > > >

Re: PESO Swirling bokeh and a stork

> effect. Enhanced a little by the sharpen ai filter in post. > > > > On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, 22:46 Larry Colen, wrote: > > > >> > >> > >>> On Sep 19, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Toine wrote: > >>> > >>> Bright sunshine and a very long focal

Re: PESO Swirling bokeh and a stork

es the effect. Enhanced a little by the sharpen ai filter in post. On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, 22:46 Larry Colen, wrote: On Sep 19, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Toine wrote: Bright sunshine and a very long focal length produces swirling air and bokeh. Very nice, but I don’t think that’s bokeh, I think ti’

Re: PESO Swirling bokeh and a stork

ry long focal length produces swirling air and > bokeh. > > Very nice, but I don’t think that’s bokeh, I think ti’s motion blur. > Notice how there are places where the blur is at the same distance as some > sharp bits. > > > > > > > https://www.repiuk.n

Re: PESO Swirling bokeh and a stork

> On Sep 19, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Toine wrote: > > Bright sunshine and a very long focal length produces swirling air and bokeh. Very nice, but I don’t think that’s bokeh, I think ti’s motion blur. Notice how there are places where the blur is at the same distance as some s

PESO Swirling bokeh and a stork

Bright sunshine and a very long focal length produces swirling air and bokeh. https://www.repiuk.nl/albums/new/#&gid=1&pid=006-334-swirling-bokeh-dscn3071-edit2021 Toine -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from

Re: More on bokeh (Was: Re: PESO: 3D pop?)

difference is (as Paul and a few others pointed out) > comes from the quality of the bokeh for the particular lens. > > As you probably know, the lead (actually, lead oxide!) in the lens glass > raises its refractive index. This allows for thinner lenses for a given focal > length. Ho

Re: More on bokeh (Was: Re: PESO: 3D pop?)

ve. The further difference is (as Paul and a few others pointed out) > > comes from the quality of the bokeh for the particular lens. > > > > As you probably know, the lead (actually, lead oxide!) in the lens glass > > raises its refractive index. This allows for thinner len

More on bokeh (Was: Re: PESO: 3D pop?)

Toine, First, let me say that you've got a very nice image! Paul has given a very simple explanation for the visual effect you (we) observe. The further difference is (as Paul and a few others pointed out) comes from the quality of the bokeh for the particular lens. As you probably

PESO: Swirly bokeh

could mount it on the A7ii. First thing you see is how "swirly" the bokeh is at f4. Interesting look... Here is the frame: https://www.flickr.com/photos/jbuhler/49015261608/in/photostream/lightbox/ j -- Juan Buhler - http://www.jbuhler.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdm

OT: Bokeh

Can you believe they made a movie about bok/ http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/bokeh-2017 Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the

Re: PESO Mud and Bokeh

That's the nicest photo of mud I've seen in quite some time. The other is nice too On April 3, 2016 8:43:08 AM PDT, Toine wrote: >>From today's walking the dog: > >Some mud: >http://www.repiuk.nl/content/murky-water-2/ > >and some blurred cows: >http://ww

PESO Mud and Bokeh

>From today's walking the dog: Some mud: http://www.repiuk.nl/content/murky-water-2/ and some blurred cows: http://www.repiuk.nl/content/bokeh-cows/ Q-S1 and 15-45 zoom Toine -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Peso:Red Glider (Full Bokeh)

Jack, The current version is appropriate for this month. The bokeh remindes me of fireworks exploding in the background. Apropo for a Red Glider! Regards, Bob S. On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > Probably so, but I consider the enhanced bokeh my reason for posting

Re: Peso:Red Glider (Full Bokeh)

Probably so, but I consider the enhanced bokeh my reason for posting the image. Perhaps oddly, in this case, I consider the bokeh a positive element. Help me! J - Original Message - From: "Christine Aguila" To: "PDML" Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 7:58:42 AM S

Re: Peso:Red Glider (Full Bokeh)

I like the dragonfly, Jack. Nice catch there, but I wonder if a tighter crop would help to minimize the background. Cheers, Christine On Jul 12, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Re-post of earlier, but with full bokeh background. > > Comments? >

Re: Peso:Red Glider (Full Bokeh)

Sorry, not available, John. Thanks for commenting. J - Original Message - From: "John" To: "PDML" Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 7:21:33 AM Subject: Re: Peso:Red Glider (Full Bokeh) On 7/12/2014 5:12 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Re-post of earlier, b

Re: Peso:Red Glider (Full Bokeh)

On 7/12/2014 5:12 PM, Jack Davis wrote: Re-post of earlier, but with full bokeh background. Comments? Jack http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=781 Link to the earlier one for comparison? -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must

Re: Peso:Red Glider (Full Bokeh)

Thanks for comment, Dan. J - Original Message - From: "Daniel J. Matyola" To: "PDML" Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 8:34:41 PM Subject: Re: Peso:Red Glider (Full Bokeh) Nice, but I like the original better. I find the bright yellow spot on the left in the Full

Re: Peso:Red Glider (Full Bokeh)

Nice, but I like the original better. I find the bright yellow spot on the left in the Full Bokeh version a bit distracting. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Re-post of earlier, but with full bokeh b

Peso:Red Glider (Full Bokeh)

Re-post of earlier, but with full bokeh background. Comments? Jack http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=781 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and

Re: On bokeh

On 5/4/2014 9:24 PM, Tim Bray wrote: Thinking about the differences between an F1.4 and an F5.6 tulip: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2014/05/04/Bokeh-or-not Horses for courses, but I prefer the F1.4 shot... May be, F2.0 would be optimal here... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: On bokeh

On 5/5/2014 6:43 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: On 5 May 2014, at 21:33, "John" wrote: Proofread Larry. On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Larry Colen wrote: On May 5, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote: He would, but it's all out of focus… Damn presbyopia. Whoever coined the term “nifty fif

Re: On bokeh

> >> On 5 May 2014, at 21:33, "John" wrote: > >> > >> Proofread Larry. On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > On May 5, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote: > > > He would, but it's all out of focus… > > Damn presbyopia. Whoever coined the term “nifty fifties” sure wasn’t talkin

Re: On bokeh

; >>> On 5/5/2014 1:57 PM, Larry Colen wrote: >>> >>>> On May 5, 2014, at 10:42 AM, John wrote: >>>> >>>> That's the way I understand bokeh, so it's at least a minority of two. >>> >>> Bokeh is the qualit

Re: On bokeh

He would, but it's all out of focus... > On 5 May 2014, at 21:33, "John" wrote: > > Proofread Larry. > >> On 5/5/2014 1:57 PM, Larry Colen wrote: >> >>> On May 5, 2014, at 10:42 AM, John wrote: >>> >>> That's the way

Re: On bokeh

Proofread Larry. On 5/5/2014 1:57 PM, Larry Colen wrote: On May 5, 2014, at 10:42 AM, John wrote: That's the way I understand bokeh, so it's at least a minority of two. Bokeh is the quality (what it’s like, not the goodness) of what is out of focus, not what it out of focus.

Re: On bokeh

"Bokeh is the quality (what it’s like, not the goodness) of what is out of focus, not what it out of focus." If you enjoy quality of life, for goodness sake never focus on a bookie. Alan C --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is ac

Re: On bokeh

On 5 May 2014, at 13:57, Larry Colen wrote: > > On May 5, 2014, at 10:42 AM, John wrote: > >> That's the way I understand bokeh, so it's at least a minority of two. > > Bokeh is the quality (what it’s like, not the goodness) of what is out of > focus, no

Re: On bokeh

On May 5, 2014, at 10:42 AM, John wrote: > That's the way I understand bokeh, so it's at least a minority of two. Bokeh is the quality (what it’s like, not the goodness) of what is out of focus, not what it out of focus. Anyone who says otherwise is wrong. > > On 5/4/

Re: On bokeh

That's the way I understand bokeh, so it's at least a minority of two. On 5/4/2014 8:04 PM, Bryan Jacoby wrote: I don't mean to be particular (sometimes pronounced "jerk"), but I believe that bokeh is the aesthetic quality of the out of focus areas of an image. What

Re: On bokeh

F1.4 is, of course,vastly better. ann On 5/4/2014 14:24, Tim Bray wrote: Thinking about the differences between an F1.4 and an F5.6 tulip: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2014/05/04/Bokeh-or-not -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: On bokeh

on 2014-05-04 18:04 Bryan Jacoby wrote I don't mean to be particular (sometimes pronounced "jerk"), but I believe that bokeh is the aesthetic quality of the out of focus areas of an image. i had the same thought on reading Tim's blog post (both about the definition of bo

Re: On bokeh

I don't mean to be particular (sometimes pronounced "jerk"), but I believe that bokeh is the aesthetic quality of the out of focus areas of an image. What you are talking about is the degree to which the background is out of focus (akin to, but not precisely the same as, depth of

On bokeh

Thinking about the differences between an F1.4 and an F5.6 tulip: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2014/05/04/Bokeh-or-not -- - Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see https://keybase.io/timbray) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman

Re: How to create Bokeh in very small FF (phone) camera

ice in terms of whatever that has to be sharp in the frame :-). On 4/17/2014 6:54 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote: In view of the recurring conversations about the FF camera and OOF blur/bokeh being one of the assumed advantages of such, I thought some people might enjoy this

Re: How to create Bokeh in very small FF (phone) camera

, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: > Fascinating. > > Thanks, Igor! > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote: >> >> >> In view of the recurring conversations about the FF camera and OOF >> blur/bokeh being one of the assumed advantages

Re: How to create Bokeh in very small FF (phone) camera

Fascinating. Thanks, Igor! On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote: > > > In view of the recurring conversations about the FF camera and OOF > blur/bokeh being one of the assumed advantages of such, I thought > some people might enjoy this bl

How to create Bokeh in very small FF (phone) camera

In view of the recurring conversations about the FF camera and OOF blur/bokeh being one of the assumed advantages of such, I thought some people might enjoy this blog post: http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2014/04/lens-blur-in-new-google-camera-app.html Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail

Re: PESO - Icy bokeh

Merci bokeh ? Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Bruce Walker" Subject: Re: PESO - Icy bokeh I was even briefly contemplating titles such as Buckets o' Bokeh, but thought better. ;-) Thank you, Attila, Bob,

Re: PESO - Icy bokeh

I was even briefly contemplating titles such as Buckets o' Bokeh, but thought better. ;-) Thank you, Attila, Bob, Godfrey, Frank and Marco. On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Attila Boros wrote: > Bokehlicious! > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: >> Fo

Re: PESO - Icy bokeh

Bokehlicious! On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: > For fans of gratuitous bokeh circles, and I know they are out there in > large numbers, or fans of gratuitous ice storms followed by deep > freezes ... > > http://www.flickriver.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/11520

Re: PESO - Icy bokeh

Even more lovely. -Marco On Dec 23, 2013, at 5:24 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > For fans of gratuitous bokeh circles, and I know they are out there in > large numbers, or fans of gratuitous ice storms followed by deep > freezes ... > > http://www.flickriver.com/photos

Re: PESO - Icy bokeh

Quite spectacular. Cheers, frank Bruce Walker wrote: >For fans of gratuitous bokeh circles, and I know they are out there in >large numbers, or fans of gratuitous ice storms followed by deep >freezes ... > >http://www.flickriver.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/11520959973/ > &g

Re: PESO - Icy bokeh

Very nice, Bruce! Godfrey > On Dec 23, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > > http://www.flickriver.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/11520959973/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link dire

Re: PESO - Icy bokeh

Ouu! On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > For fans of gratuitous bokeh circles, and I know they are out there in > large numbers, or fans of gratuitous ice storms followed by deep > freezes ... > > http://www.flickriver.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/11520959973/

PESO - Icy bokeh

For fans of gratuitous bokeh circles, and I know they are out there in large numbers, or fans of gratuitous ice storms followed by deep freezes ... http://www.flickriver.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/11520959973/ K-3, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 135mm/f:3.2, 1/400th sec, ISO 400, handheld. Post in Lightroom

Re: OT: Interesting Bokeh Effects

From: mike wilson On 02/10/2012 23:20, Mark Roberts wrote: Daniel J. Matyola wrote: http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/inspiration/30-stunning-bokeh-photography/ Pity they're mistaking specular highlights for bokeh. If bokeh means blur, I have hard drives full of better pictures than

Re: OT: Interesting Bokeh Effects

what's interesting to me is that someone took the time to name these effects. -Original Message- >From: "Daniel J. Matyola" >Subject: OT: Interesting Bokeh Effects > >http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/inspiration/30-stunning-bokeh-photography/ >Dan Matyola >

RE: OT: Interesting Bokeh Effects

That made my eyes hurt. Cheers, frank "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." -- Christopher Hitchens --- Original Message --- From: "Daniel J. Matyola" Sent: October 2, 2012 10/2/12 To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Subject: OT: I

Re: OT: Interesting Bokeh Effects

I was thinking the same thing. Too bad that they only know half the definition of bokeh. On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > >>http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/inspiration/30-stunning-bokeh-photography/ > > Pity they're mistaking

Re: OT: Interesting Bokeh Effects

On 02/10/2012 23:20, Mark Roberts wrote: Daniel J. Matyola wrote: http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/inspiration/30-stunning-bokeh-photography/ Pity they're mistaking specular highlights for bokeh. If bokeh means blur, I have hard drives full of better pictures than those. -- No fixed

Re: OT: Interesting Bokeh Effects

Daniel J. Matyola wrote: >http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/inspiration/30-stunning-bokeh-photography/ Pity they're mistaking specular highlights for bokeh. -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml

Re: OT - I take my coffee with creamy bokeh

: OT - I take my coffee with creamy bokeh A good friend of mine bought me a new coffee mug, and everyone says it's a very appropriate gift for me: http://goo.gl/3XtMe Now, one might think this is a Dark Side mug, but in fact it is not! Whoever made this mug changed *just enough* to not get su

Re: OT - I take my coffee with creamy bokeh

I believe you could use the DA 300 for a pint of beer. On 6/19/2012 1:34 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote: Godfrey: Then DA* 200 and DA* 300 might be adequate. :-) Igor Tue Jun 19 12:59:45 EDT 2012 Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: My doppio espresso drinks are too large to fit in a DA21, FA43 or FA77 mug ... !

Re: OT - I take my coffee with creamy bokeh

Godfrey: Then DA* 200 and DA* 300 might be adequate. :-) Igor Tue Jun 19 12:59:45 EDT 2012 Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: My doppio espresso drinks are too large to fit in a DA21, FA43 or FA77 mug ... ! G On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:31 AM, John Celio wrote: > A good friend of mine bought me a new co

Re: OT - I take my coffee with creamy bokeh

My doppio espresso drinks are too large to fit in a DA21, FA43 or FA77 mug ... ! G On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:31 AM, John Celio wrote: > A good friend of mine bought me a new coffee mug, and everyone says > it's a very appropriate gift for me: > http://goo.gl/3XtMe > > Now, one might think this i

OT - I take my coffee with creamy bokeh

A good friend of mine bought me a new coffee mug, and everyone says it's a very appropriate gift for me: http://goo.gl/3XtMe Now, one might think this is a Dark Side mug, but in fact it is not! Whoever made this mug changed *just enough* to not get sued. The brand is not Canon, it's "HOMADE": http

Re: OT Nikon Bokeh Meter

On 2 April 2012 17:17, P. J. Alling wrote: > http://photo.net/nikon-camera-forum/00aDI7?start=0 > > So it's April second, so sue me. I was late reading it too. Still made me laugh...especially the 4 first people who commented :-) —M. \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com http:/

OT Nikon Bokeh Meter

http://photo.net/nikon-camera-forum/00aDI7?start=0 So it's April second, so sue me. -- Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a lengthily search. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

On 8/24/2011 4:23 PM, Bob W wrote: Could use a little tweaking. -- Walt We all feel that way sometimes, Walt, but don't worry, it'll pass. B Only to return again moments later. -- Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCR

RE: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

> Could use a little tweaking. > > -- Walt > We all feel that way sometimes, Walt, but don't worry, it'll pass. B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

he Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, "Bokeh": >> http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg >> >> But, I'm quite happy with the whole set of pictures. > > Very well done. Thanks. > > cheers, > f

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

Could use a little tweaking. -- Walt On 8/17/2011 8:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote: A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid modeling gigs, and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like. Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, "Bokeh&q

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid modeling > gigs, and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like. > > Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite,  "Bokeh": &g

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

2011/8/23 Larry Colen : > > On Aug 23, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Cotty wrote: > >> >> Lar that sucks :) > > I don't know, I rather liked the net effect. I'll have to trawl through some old pics for something similar. >>> >>> I was wondering whether you were a netter or a hooker. >> >>

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

On Aug 23, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Cotty wrote: > > Lar that sucks :) I don't know, I rather liked the net effect. >>> >>> I'll have to trawl through some old pics for something similar. >> >> I was wondering whether you were a netter or a hooker. > > Trouble with me is when I should

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

Lar that sucks :) >>> >>> I don't know, I rather liked the net effect. >> >> I'll have to trawl through some old pics for something similar. > >I was wondering whether you were a netter or a hooker. Trouble with me is when I should be hooking I'm netting, and when I should be netting I'm hoo

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

On Aug 21, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Cotty wrote: > >>> Lar that sucks :) >> >> I don't know, I rather liked the net effect. > > I'll have to trawl through some old pics for something similar. I was wondering whether you were a netter or a hooker. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

>> Lar that sucks :) > >I don't know, I rather liked the net effect. I'll have to trawl through some old pics for something similar. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

On 18/08/2011 23:04, Sam L wrote: On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:44 AM, mike wilson wrote: On 18/08/2011 03:59, Larry Colen wrote: Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, "Bokeh": http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg But, I'm q

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Cotty wrote: > On 17/8/11, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, "Bokeh": >> http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg > > Lar that suck

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

On 18/8/11, Sam L, discombobulated, unleashed: >Coffee out my nose and on my keyboard. Always a pleasure at my expense :) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mai

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

On 17/8/11, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed: >Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, "Bokeh": >http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg Lar that sucks :) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People,

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:44 AM, mike wilson wrote: > On 18/08/2011 03:59, Larry Colen wrote: >> >> Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite,  "Bokeh": >> http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg >> >>

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

some photos to post on model mayhem and the like. >> >> Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, "Bokeh": >> http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg >> >> But, I'm quite happy with the whole set of picture

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

ike. > > Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite,  "Bokeh": > http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg > > But, I'm quite happy with the whole set of pictures. > > > > -- > Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent f

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

On Aug 18, 2011, at 6:24 AM, Steve Larson wrote: > Beautiful, nice bokeh. What lens and aperture? FA77 f/9.0 ISO 80 1/80 second with studio flashes > Steve > > - Original Message - From: "Larry Colen" > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Se

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

ent. Must refrain... Must On 8/17/2011 9:59 PM, Larry Colen wrote: A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid modeling gigs, and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like. Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, "Bokeh": ht

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

has a friend who wants to try to get some paid modeling gigs, and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like. Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, "Bokeh": http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg But, I'm quite happy w

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

et some paid modeling >> gigs, and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like. >> >> Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite,  "Bokeh": >> http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg >> >> But, I'm q

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

favorite, "Bokeh": http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg But, I'm quite happy with the whole set of pictures. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

On 18/08/2011 03:59, Larry Colen wrote: A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid modeling gigs, and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like. Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, "Bokeh": http://red4est.com/lr

Re: PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

Beautiful, nice bokeh. What lens and aperture? Steve - Original Message - From: "Larry Colen" To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 6:59 PM Subject: PESO Bokeh (NSFW) A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid

PESO Bokeh (NSFW)

A friend of mine has a friend who wants to try to get some paid modeling gigs, and wanted some photos to post on model mayhem and the like. Of the Not Safe For Work set, I think this is my favorite, "Bokeh": http://red4est.com/lrc/pix/nsfw/110817_fetlife/20110817-LRC24789.jpg But,

OT - Samsung researching simulated bokeh

http://www.photographybay.com/2011/07/19/samsung-working-on-dslr-like-bokeh-for-compact-cameras/?awt_l=CE3oF&awt_m=IyaKA6dGYv62xu regards, Anthony    "Of what use is lens and light     to those who lack in mind and sight"                                                (Anon) -

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

Content just isn't compelling enough for me. Light, bokeh--etc fine. Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: "Sasha Sobol" To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 10:41 PM Subject: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open http://ww

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

On Jan 26, 2011, at 2:00 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > Seeing as you don't actually own in any meaningful sense /any/ Kindle book, I > guess that's up to you, but how much is actual ownership worth? > > On 1/26/2011 1:59 PM, steve harley wrote: >> On 2011-01-25 13:01 , Eric Weir wrote: >>> >>> On

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

On Jan 26, 2011, at 1:59 PM, steve harley wrote: > On 2011-01-25 13:01 , Eric Weir wrote: >> >> On Jan 25, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Bob W wrote: >> >>> I was lucky enough to get my copies of both books at list price, before they >>> really attracted attention from people on the internet. They sold out

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

If you don't trust Amazon, you can easily download all of your ebooks to your computer. This is easy to do. On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:00 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > Seeing as you don't actually own in any meaningful sense /any/ Kindle book, > I guess that's up to you, but how much is actual owners

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

Seeing as you don't actually own in any meaningful sense /any/ Kindle book, I guess that's up to you, but how much is actual ownership worth? On 1/26/2011 1:59 PM, steve harley wrote: On 2011-01-25 13:01 , Eric Weir wrote: On Jan 25, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Bob W wrote: I was lucky enough to get m

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

On 2011-01-25 13:01 , Eric Weir wrote: On Jan 25, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Bob W wrote: I was lucky enough to get my copies of both books at list price, before they really attracted attention from people on the internet. They sold out very quickly and seem to have attained cult status. Literally, o

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

Boris, feel free to do whatever you want with the wording :) --S On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: > Sorry for being late. I kind of dislike the bokeh, Sasha. It is nervous, > unpleasant. It seems that the distance between you, the guy and the rest of > the imag

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/5382974835/ >> > >>> >> > >>> Tell me what you think even if you do not like it. >> > >> >> > >> as a photograph that shows off the capabilities of the lens it's >> > excellent. >> &

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

On Jan 25, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Bob W wrote: > I was lucky enough to get my copies of both books at list price, before they > really attracted attention from people on the internet. They sold out very > quickly and seem to have attained cult status. Literally, on Amazon right now you can have On Be

RE: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

> > It is an excellent essay, and very interesting and relevant. Other > than the specific references to film, it reads like it was written > yesterday. > > Yes, it is. I will be reading it again many times over. Will probably > get his and Hurn's book, too, I think I'll avoid the expensive one --

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

On Jan 25, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: > It is an excellent essay, and very interesting and relevant. Other than the > specific references to film, it reads like it was written yesterday. Yes, it is. I will be reading it again many times over. Will probably get his and Hurn's book, t

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

On 11-01-25 8:57 AM, Eric Weir wrote: On Jan 24, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Bob W wrote: This is the piece I'm referring to: Hurn& Jay have a lot to say about this question in On Being A Photographer. Well worth reading. To summarise, sub

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

On Jan 24, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Bob W wrote: > This is the piece I'm referring to: > > >> Hurn & Jay have a lot to say about this question in On Being A >> Photographer. Well worth reading. To summarise, subject matter is >> everything.

Re: peso - some bokeh - fa 77 wide open

On 1/25/2011 3:05 AM, Bob W wrote: This is the piece I'm referring to: Thanks a lot! Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit th

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >