Re: Brand wars [WAS: Re: MZ-S is really good ?]

2001-04-22 Thread dave o'brien
A scroll of mail from "Paradiso" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:43:38 -0700 Read it? y ...and matrix metering were much more important to me, You have a problem with the *metering* of the Z1-p? My mind is truly boggled now. This camera has, in my experience, one of the best metering

Re: Brand wars [WAS: Re: MZ-S is really good ?]

2001-04-20 Thread Paradiso
--- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:38:21 +0800 From: "dave o'brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Brand wars [WAS: Re: MZ-S is really good ?] Funny you should say that, as a Nikon using friend of mine kept found that he had to get the databack for his F90X to certain essential fea

Brand wars [WAS: Re: MZ-S is really good ?]

2001-04-19 Thread Paradiso
As the lively chats between Doug Brewer and "Pentax Clover" continues, I'd like to say this: I began photography 21 years ago in 1980 with a Spotmatic II, then over the years went through a K1000, Super Program, 2 MX's and finally an LX in 1996. But in 1998 I finally jumped into the AF foray,

Re: Brand wars [WAS: Re: MZ-S is really good ?]

2001-04-19 Thread Conrad Samuels
preference is that the Pentax lenses have a certain luminosity which some of the Nikkors lack. Conrad F. Samuels Kirstenhof SA - Original Message - From: "Paradiso" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Pentax Mailing List" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 6:50 PM Subject: Bra