I reckon, one of the reasons why I *don't* upgrade from K10D to K20D is
that K10 works for me up to and including of some nice A3 prints...
Additionally, A50/1.2 definitely rules.
;-)
Boris
DDerby Chang wrote:
I don't think this can be said often enough
"The more that people get interested
Or you could just do it till your vision is a little blurry
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: Bravo Mike.
In a message dated 12/23/2008 12:25:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
war...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not a pixel-p
In a message dated 12/23/2008 12:25:56 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
war...@gmail.com writes:
> I'm not a pixel-peeper myself, but if people want to peep at pixels,
> where's
> the harm? A bit like stamp-collecting or train-spotting.
It is another of those things that will make you go blind if
Agree - that's why I stick to film: grain is less dangerous than pixels.
Luiz Felipe
luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br
Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:25:29 -0600, "William Robb" escreveu:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bob W"
> Subject: RE: Bravo Mike.
&
Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Bob W wrote:
>
> > I'm not a pixel-peeper myself, but if people want to peep at pixels, where's
> > the harm? A bit like stamp-collecting or train-spotting.
>
> No harm, and a great deal of benefit. Everyone on this list has
> benef
As long as they don't get married.
>>> "Bob W" 12/23/2008 3:19 PM >>>
>
> "Are you making prints or are you pixel-peeping? (And if you're
> pixel-peeping, why?)"
>
I'm not a pixel-peeper myself, but if people want to peep at pixels,
where's
the harm? A bit like stamp-collecting or train-spot
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:23 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts"
> Subject: Re: Bravo Mike.
>
>
>
> And, ironically, the comments about the viewfinder and dynamic range in
> that very article are pushing even more *towar
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Hunt"
Now, please turn to Hymn 317, "Go Tell It on the Focal Plane."
MARK!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and fol
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Hunt"
Now, please turn to Hymn 317, "Go Tell It on the Focal Plane."
LOL big time! Cheers, Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit th
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Bob W wrote:
> I'm not a pixel-peeper myself, but if people want to peep at pixels, where's
> the harm? A bit like stamp-collecting or train-spotting.
No harm, and a great deal of benefit. Everyone on this list has
benefited from the work of pixel-peepers. Some
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: Bravo Mike.
"Are you making prints or are you pixel-peeping? (And if you're
pixel-peeping, why?)"
I'm not a pixel-peeper myself, but if people want to peep at pixels,
where's
the harm? A
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: Bravo Mike.
And, ironically, the comments about the viewfinder and dynamic range in
that very article are pushing even more *toward* the idea of picking up
a Sony A900 and a couple of Zeiss primes!
One of my very
>
> "Are you making prints or are you pixel-peeping? (And if you're
> pixel-peeping, why?)"
>
I'm not a pixel-peeper myself, but if people want to peep at pixels, where's
the harm? A bit like stamp-collecting or train-spotting.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.n
Derby Chang wrote:
I don't think this can be said often enough
"The more that people get interested in the pictures they're making, the
less they obsess about equipment. Try it. It's really true—it really
works."
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2008/12/the-full
Mike J. wrote on The Online Photographer:
"The more that people get interested in the pictures they're making, the
less they obsess about equipment. Try it. It's really true—it really works."
It's worked a lot for me.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mail
Mike J. wrote elsewhere:
"Are you making prints or are you pixel-peeping? (And if you're
pixel-peeping, why?)"
Mark!
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and f
Derby Chang wrote:
I don't think this can be said often enough
"The more that people get interested in the pictures they're making, the
less they obsess about equipment. Try it. It's really true—it really
works."
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2008/12/the-full
I don't think this can be said often enough
"The more that people get interested in the pictures they're making, the
less they obsess about equipment. Try it. It's really true—it really works."
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2008/12/the-full-frame.html
--
de
18 matches
Mail list logo
