Re: Buying KM or not?

2002-10-19 Thread andre
(I'm using K1000 as a comparison point, because you don't see that many KM's for sale, and the KM is a similar body) Over a K1000, it has depth-of-field preview, self-timer and I don't remember the third one... I think $70US with a lens is a very good deal. It is. --

Re: Buying KM or not?

2002-10-19 Thread frank theriault
Assuming it to be working, buy it. Here in Toronto, Canada, K1000's without lenses go for $150 to $200 US. They seem to regularly to for over $100 on eBay, often higher. (I'm using K1000 as a comparison point, because you don't see that many KM's for sale, and the KM is a similar body) I think $7

R: Buying KM or not?

2002-10-19 Thread talampaya
Bob S. wrote: >A K1000 with a self timer on board. And DOF preview. >You could have (...) a Super A for not much more. [70 USD] Where? Fabio

Re: Buying KM or not?

2002-10-19 Thread Brad Dobo
MAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 5:15 AM Subject: Re: Buying KM or not? > Hello Petter > > Pentax KM is a nice camera, if you can live with the fact that the > exposure-meter is switched on when you remove the lens-cap. US$70 se

Re: Buying KM or not?

2002-10-19 Thread Anders Werholt
AIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, 19 October, 2002 10:02 Subject: Buying KM or not? > Hi list! > > I have the opportunity to buy a Pentax KM with a 50mm (not specified > which) for ~US$70. Nothing known on condition. > > Should I? > > file://Petter > Skåne Sweden > > >

Buying KM or not?

2002-10-19 Thread Petter Jarbo
Hi list! I have the opportunity to buy a Pentax KM with a 50mm (not specified which) for ~US$70. Nothing known on condition. Should I? //Petter Skåne Sweden