On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Jack Davis wrote:
There was a time I avoided using Fuji print film due
to my perception of a yellow bias.
In my case (and as I was typing I thought that) the issue may have
been the lab warming up colours. I found a mail-order lab that uses
Fuji equipment and paper and I
Mensagem original-
De: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: domingo, 28 de Agosto de 2005 0:14
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: RE: Color Plus and other Kodak films?
Did the article define what was meant by "best"?
As long as I can find it, I'll use no film
There was a time I avoided using Fuji print film due
to my perception of a yellow bias. Haven't used it for
a long while.
Do you rarely make enlargements and find the 400's an
exposure convenience?
Jack
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Jack Davis wrote:
No it didn't. It just states the awarding prizes.
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: domingo, 28 de Agosto de 2005 0:14
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: RE: Color Plus and other Kodak films?
Did the article define what was meant by
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Jack Davis wrote:
Did the article define what was meant by "best"?
As long as I can find it, I'll use no film with an ISO
higher than 100.
I have the same question, but for different reasons: I dismissed
Kodak colour print film (I don't do slides) years ago as I found it
hnical Image Press Association)
> 2005 Prices. The best films are the Kodak Elite
> Color negative films 200 and
> 400 ISSO.
>
> Manuel
> -Mensagem original-
> De: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviada: sábado, 27 de Agosto de 2005 16:32
> Para: pentax-d
, 27 de Agosto de 2005 16:32
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: Re: Color Plus and other Kodak films?
I see what you're referring to. If specs studied, differences between Elite
and U.C. may be apparent.
Only one I noticed in a brief scan of specs, U.C.
avail. 100 and 400 ISO. Elite; 200 an
I see what you're referring to. If specs studied,
differences between Elite and U.C. may be apparent.
Only one I noticed in a brief scan of specs, U.C.
avail. 100 and 400 ISO. Elite; 200 and 400 ISO.
Jack
--- Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack Davis wrote:
>
> >Toralf,
> >I've shot
Jack Davis wrote:
Toralf,
I've shot several rolls of Ultra Color (available in
100 and 400 ISO). Snappy, vivid colors, as you might
expect. Kodak claims UC produces the most vivid colors
of any print film. As I've mentioned here before, I
set the ISO at 125 to reduce the likelihood of whites
blo
Toralf,
I've shot several rolls of Ultra Color (available in
100 and 400 ISO). Snappy, vivid colors, as you might
expect. Kodak claims UC produces the most vivid colors
of any print film. As I've mentioned here before, I
set the ISO at 125 to reduce the likelihood of whites
blowing out. Relatively
Hi all.
Even though everyone here knows that Kodak is almost dead, or their film
division anyway, they still seem to produce a surprisingly wide range of
films. Or at least, they have a confusingly wide range of product names
for films...
One I noticed popping up recently, was one called "Co
11 matches
Mail list logo
