Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:38 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> > http://www.pentaxmedical.com/brochures/PENTAX_2009iPLATFORM.pdf
> >
> > Got to see one in action today ... well, not exactly "see" it ... more like
> > it saw me. :-(
>
> GESO?
Groan Every So Often?
--
PD
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:38 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> http://www.pentaxmedical.com/brochures/PENTAX_2009iPLATFORM.pdf
>
> Got to see one in action today ... well, not exactly "see" it ... more like
> it saw me. :-(
GESO?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/l
On 2010-03-31 17:38, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Doug Franklin
On 2010-03-30 17:04, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> We've upped our standards, now up yours!
One of my favorite quotations of all time.
http://www.pentaxmedical.com/brochures/PENTAX_2009iPLATFORM.pdf
Got to see one in action today ... wel
John,
I knew you were starving for a reason.
Always good to be checked...
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:38 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Doug Franklin
>>
>> On 2010-03-30 17:04, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>>>
>>> > We've upped our standards, now up yours!
>>
>> One of my favorite quotatio
From: Doug Franklin
On 2010-03-30 17:04, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> We've upped our standards, now up yours!
One of my favorite quotations of all time.
http://www.pentaxmedical.com/brochures/PENTAX_2009iPLATFORM.pdf
Got to see one in action today ... well, not exactly "see" it ... more
like it
On 2010-03-30 17:04, Bruce Dayton wrote:
We've upped our standards, now up yours!
One of my favorite quotations of all time. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
On 3/30/2010 5:00 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Miserere wrote:
...Also illustrating the "mums with cams" phenomenon.
That was a lot of my business loss right there. They would even come
over to me and ask how the camera worked.
Dave
You should
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
New motto:
Our Best Is None Too Good!
Or, "When you can't afford quality, we're there for you!"
"Miracle Photography. If it's a good photo, it's a miracle!"
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.
On 3/30/2010 3:03 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Note the TV judge episode recently referenced
where the pro photographer didn't even know the aperture of her lens. In
most cases, her gear and knowledge were up to the task of what she was
trying
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message - From: "Larry Colen"
> Subject: Re: Declining Pro Photography Careers
>
>
>> On 3/30/2010 2:00 PM,
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Re: Declining Pro Photography Careers
On 3/30/2010 2:00 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
New motto:
Our Best Is None Too Good!
Or, "
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Note the TV judge episode recently referenced
> where the pro photographer didn't even know the aperture of her lens. In
> most cases, her gear and knowledge were up to the task of what she was
> trying to do.
I saw that one. What a hoot.
Judg
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Miserere wrote:
> ...Also illustrating the "mums with cams" phenomenon.
That was a lot of my business loss right there. They would even come
over to me and ask how the camera worked.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://b
"If you don't like our work, you just don't understand art."
--- On Tue, 3/30/10, Tom C wrote:
> From: Tom C
> Subject: Re: Declining Pro Photography Careers
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Tuesday, March 30, 2010, 2:34 PM
> "At (f
"At (fill in the blank) quality is job one. We didn't think you'd
notice so we decided to tell you."
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> How about:
>
> We've upped our standards, now up yours!
>
>
> --
> Bruce
>
>
> Tuesday, March 30, 2010, 2:00:40 PM, you wrote:
>
> MR> Bruce
How about:
We've upped our standards, now up yours!
--
Bruce
Tuesday, March 30, 2010, 2:00:40 PM, you wrote:
MR> Bruce Dayton wrote:
>>New motto:
>>
>>Our Best Is None Too Good!
MR> Or, "When you can't afford quality, we're there for you!"
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.n
On 3/30/2010 2:00 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
New motto:
Our Best Is None Too Good!
Or, "When you can't afford quality, we're there for you!"
The best quality you can afford.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.ne
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>New motto:
>
>Our Best Is None Too Good!
Or, "When you can't afford quality, we're there for you!"
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
t
New motto:
Our Best Is None Too Good!
--
Bruce
Tuesday, March 30, 2010, 1:06:20 PM, you wrote:
TC> Your high standard of mediocrity appalls me. ;-)
>>
>> Nope, it's just that mediocre is usually good enough.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --M.
>>>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
Your high standard of mediocrity appalls me. ;-)
>
> Nope, it's just that mediocre is usually good enough.
>
>
>>
>>
>> --M.
>>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and f
early kodak/nikon DCS 620 cameras. Joe
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 11:28:47 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: Declining Pro Photography Careers
I think in the pre internet days, the
On 3/30/2010 9:12 AM, Miserere wrote:
...Also illustrating the "mums with cams" phenomenon.
I can't imagine trying to make it as a pro photographer nowadays,
especially in some segments where you're being undercut by Uncle Fred
and the paying customers can't tell the difference between the work
They didn't touch on the wedding and portraiture industries but they
are feeling pretty much the same thing.
Technology has lowered the bar for more people to get in with less
knowledge. That works ok, until there is a situation that the
technology doesn't handle and then you see catastrophic fai
On 3/30/2010 11:12 AM, Miserere wrote:
...Also illustrating the "mums with cams" phenomenon.
I can't imagine trying to make it as a pro photographer nowadays,
especially in some segments where you're being undercut by Uncle Fred
and the paying customers can't tell the difference between the work
...Also illustrating the "mums with cams" phenomenon.
I can't imagine trying to make it as a pro photographer nowadays,
especially in some segments where you're being undercut by Uncle Fred
and the paying customers can't tell the difference between the work of
a true pro and that of Uncle Fred.
I
I think in the pre internet days, the pros were just that. Move to
were the action, story is and go for it.
Now with images available almost instantly, and a host of bloggers,
that world is pretty much dead.
Dave
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Here's a NY Times article
Here's a NY Times article describing what we all know or felt.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/30/business/media/30photogs.html?th&emc=th
My take is that the romantic vision of the Pro Photographer jetting
around the world to capture magazine images is Dead-on-Arrival. I
think Paul S.'s example i
27 matches
Mail list logo
