I'll take your statement one step farther & state that what matters is the image
produced with either film or pixels.
-Original Message-
From: Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sep 17, 2004 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Deegetal Schmeedgital
In the good old day
We were discussing SLRs, Shel. Last time I checked a K1000 was perfectly
capable of holding a lens in the proper position in front of the film
plane.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'd take issue with the initial premise. The quality of a camera body is,
and has always been, an important consideration a
I'd take issue with the initial premise. The quality of a camera body is,
and has always been, an important consideration and a strong factor in
obtaining and making quality photographs.
Lens alignment to the film plane is important, so the lens mount on the
body and the mechanics of lens alignme
Amen to what you wrote.
Jim A.
> From: Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:28:01 -0400
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Deegetal Schmeedgital
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:26:32
has to be a decent lineup of lenses *in production* to
support whatever digital cameras they produce.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Caveman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 4:28 PM
Subject: Deegetal Schmeedgital
5 matches
Mail list logo
