Hi!
I'm aware that the rechargeable batteries in digital cameras
eventually wear out. How about the memory? Spec'd at so
many reformats, or not?
Lon, my impression is that the mechanics of shutter release would wear
out way before built-in memory starts to exhibit problems. As to
external memo
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> Not exactly true. USB 2.0 interfaces are downwards compatible. So if you
> connect *istD to USB2.0 enabled PC it will work without any problems.
> Personally I wouldn't bother with this.
And by the way, how fast can the camera read the memory card
L PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Does digital "film" memory wear out?
>
>
> Must just be a slow card I had then? Or is MMC slower than
> CF anyway?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: tom
type of card and the quality of that card. Are CF
cards faster than SD/MMC??
> -Original Message-
> From: T Rittenhouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 August 2003 15:39
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Does digital "film" memory wear out?
>
>
>But still, again MHO would be that modern electronics are not built to
>last, like for example M-series cameras last - seemingly forever... So
>having to replace your DSLR camera body every 2-3 years seems like a
>quite normal course of action.
Interesting. Of course, I have no intention of fo
Hi!
Nobody in their right mind would faff about plugging up the camera to
the
computer! Aside from the chore, most current DSLRs have
plastic/rubber
coverings for the data ports and we al know what happens to plastic/
rubber coverings once enough movement is introduced.
Arghhh. It shows that I n
- Original Message -
From: "Lon Williamson"
Subject: Does digital "film" memory wear out?
> I'm aware that the rechargeable batteries in digital cameras
> eventually wear out. How about the memory? Spec'd at so
> many reformats, or not?
The nu
now digicams for this lad.
no...
Misprints, misprints... Dream of fluent touch typing...
Boris
on 11.08.03 6:36, Boris Liberman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now, Cotty, notice that from what is written in the spec of *ist D, it
> appears that the darn thing has USB 1.1. It means that there could be
> some PC boxes already that won't be able to pull data from the camera.
> Then of course, j
>Now, Cotty, notice that from what is written in the spec of *ist D, it
>appears that the darn thing has USB 1.1. It means that there could be
>some PC boxes already that won't be able to pull data from the camera.
>Then of course, just few days ago some company announced a CD-Writer
>with addition
Hi!
C> Interesting. Of course, I have no intention of following such a course of
C> action. I will be a T-plus one year soon, and I will be sending the body
C> off for a CLA (or whatever they call it for DSLRs). I plan to keep mine
C> going for at least 5 years, more likely 10.
C> At some point i
Hi!
Not exactly true. USB 2.0 interfaces are downwards compatible. So if
you
connect *istD to USB2.0 enabled PC it will work without any problems.
Personally I wouldn't bother with this. I would for sure buy external
reader
- much more convenient to use than connecting cable to camera every
tim
Cotty wrote:
>
> >But still, again MHO would be that modern electronics are not built to
> >last, like for example M-series cameras last - seemingly forever... So
> >having to replace your DSLR camera body every 2-3 years seems like a
> >quite normal course of action.
>
> Interesting. Of course
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> I only have limited experience, but have found that the difference
> between USB 1.1 and USB 2 card readers is negligible. The
> read speed of
> the card/reader seems to be the limiting factor here.
I have found a hu
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:40 AM
Subject: Re: Does digital "film" memory wear out?
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
>
> > Not exactly true. USB 2.0 interfaces are downwards compatible. So if you
> > conn
Must just be a slow card I had then? Or is MMC slower than CF anyway?
> -Original Message-
> From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 August 2003 16:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Does digital "film" memory wear out?
>
>
> > ---
I'm aware that the rechargeable batteries in digital cameras
eventually wear out. How about the memory? Spec'd at so
many reformats, or not?
-Lon
Hi!
And by the way, how fast can the camera read the memory card anyway?
USB 2.0 is 480 Mbit/s and USB 1.1 is 12 Mbit/s. If the camera doesn't
make
use of the higher speed, maybe there is no need for USB 2.0?
Valid point too. Again, very soon new generation of cards would come
out. Camera h/w an
18 matches
Mail list logo
