you know you had the smc tak 105 2.8 in one camera bag, moved it
somewhere else but can't remember
where.
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://
You've just described my recent life, sadly.
David J Brooks wrote:
you know you had the smc tak 105 2.8 in one camera bag, moved it
somewhere else but can't remember
where.
Dave
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin himself wit
Dave,
Just did a frantic search for the 1st copy of the M 35mm f2 lens I have.
After going thru everything, I verified that I do still have two
copies before I sold one on ebay.
Now to stop my wife from setting fire to the pile in the middle of the
family room...
When she says 'Did all of this come
Even at my stage of mental decay, if I had a smc tak 105 2.8, I'm sure I
would never forget where I had left it
:-)>
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:45 -0400, "David
Hah. For a day or two I wasn't able to put my hand on my A* 300/2.8,
which is a heck of a lot larger. You might think it would be hard to
lose track of something like that, but you'd be wrong.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 06:46:10PM +1000, Brian Walters wrote:
> Even at my stage of mental decay, if
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
> Even at my stage of mental decay, if I had a smc tak 105 2.8, I'm sure I
> would never forget where I had left it
Well, i know its in side a 900 square foot house, so how hard could it
be to find it right.:-)
I did manage to find my old
Perhaps it /is/ possible to have too many lenses.
John Francis wrote:
Hah. For a day or two I wasn't able to put my hand on my A* 300/2.8,
which is a heck of a lot larger. You might think it would be hard to
lose track of something like that, but you'd be wrong.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 06:46:
John Francis wrote:
Hah. For a day or two I wasn't able to put my hand on my A* 300/2.8,
which is a heck of a lot larger. You might think it would be hard to
lose track of something like that, but you'd be wrong.
I know what you mean. A Tokina SD 400/5.6 spent over a year lost in my
house.
From: David J Brooks
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
> Even at my stage of mental decay, if I had a smc tak 105 2.8, I'm sure I
> would never forget where I had left it
Well, i know its in side a 900 square foot house, so how hard could it
be to find it right.:-)
I d
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 05:02:00AM -0400, John Francis wrote:
>
> Hah. For a day or two I wasn't able to put my hand on my A* 300/2.8,
> which is a heck of a lot larger. You might think it would be hard to
> lose track of something like that, but you'd be wrong.
It IS hard to lose track of some
Found it.
For some reason i said to my self, self, look UNDER the dresser the lens was on.
So i did.
So i found it.
Our 2 1/2 year old cat Lucy, likes to push things off of tables chairs
etc. I fear she may have done that to the lens.
It was in its original case and landed on some other junk be
From: "David J Brooks"
Found it.
Good!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
12 matches
Mail list logo
