On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, William Robb wrote:
> Since I started the HTML thing as a trial balloon, I will now attempt
> to add a wee bit of common sense (something remarkably lacking in this
> thread). All Chris has to do is post a name and a location to a web
> page. Yer email address has no reason t
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Chris Brogden wrote:
> As long as the web address isn't published, but kept confidential in
> private replies,
Something else I just thought of, Bill. For me, it's no more work to mail
out the complete list to everyone than it is to mail out the URL. Same
amount of time ei
on 2/14/01 8:43 PM, Chris Brogden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I considered posting the info without e-mail addresses, but thought that
> part of the point was to make it easy to communicate with someone in a
> particular location. If I don't include the e-mail addresses, then people
> will
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:43 PM
Subject: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities
> Do people care about this? What are your feeling regarding e-mail
> addresses or no e-mail addresses? The way I see it, if the majority of
>
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Brogden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 3:43 AM
Subject: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities
Hello Chris
My vote:
In order to make it easy to communicate with s
5 matches
Mail list logo
