Just received my spanking new R2400, this morning. Guess I should be
happy. Sorry to say I'm not. Not at all.
Part of it is my usual attack of buyer's remorse, some kind of
post-natal depression I usually go through after every major purchase.
Especially when circumstances have forced me to buy so
Have you tried that paper in the printer? Just because they say it
doesn't work doesn't mean that it doesn't work! :^)
At 11:49 PM +0100 3/12/08, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
>Just received my spanking new R2400, this morning. Guess I should be
>happy. Sorry to say I'm not. Not at all.
>
>Part of i
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Sharpe" <
Subject: Re: Epson R2400 anyone?
Have you tried that paper in the printer? Just because they say it
doesn't work doesn't mean that it doesn't work! :^)
At worst, he might have to create his own profile, whi
One more thing: You can print as large a panorama as you want on roll paper.
Both of the stocks I mentioned, and many others, are available on rolls, and
the roll printing option works great on the R2400. I have some third party
canvas on a roll that prints great.
Paul
-- Original m
Epson Ultra Premium Luster prints superbly in both BW and color with the Photo
Black ink set. It's just a slight luster, a very nice finish and it gives great
detail. Velvet Fine Art is a watercolor-like stock with a bit of tooth. It
prints with the Matte Black ink and renders beautifully in bot
I print exclusively matte surface papers with the Matte Black ink cart.
- Epson Enhanced Matte (or whatever the heck they're calling it today)
works well for many photos and proofs.
- Epson Velvet Fine Art is wonderful for finish work, B&W or color.
- Hahnemühle Photo Rag Smooth is a wonderful p
You mean as large as you want up to 32 inches long per image... ;-)
G
On Mar 12, 2008, at 6:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One more thing: You can print as large a panorama as you want on
> roll paper. Both of the stocks I mentioned, and many others, are
> available on rolls, and the roll
True. There is a limit. I wasn't sure if that was true of the R2400.
I know it was true of the 2200.
Paul
On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:32 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> You mean as large as you want up to 32 inches long per image... ;-)
>
> G
>
> On Mar 12, 2008, at 6:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
On 3/12/08, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True. There is a limit. I wasn't sure if that was true of the R2400.
> I know it was true of the 2200.
> > You mean as large as you want up to 32 inches long per image... ;-)
I think it's a function of Epson's print drivers. I hit the same
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem? I can't use the heaps of Epson Photo Paper I still have.
> This is particularly bitter for the Panorama size (21 x 60 cm) as they
> make no other paper in this format.
Why can't you use the paper you
Seems to me I read that there is a 44" limit. (?)
Jack
--- Mat Maessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/12/08, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > True. There is a limit. I wasn't sure if that was true of the
> R2400.
> > I know it was true of the 2200.
> > > You mean as large as you
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ralf R. Radermacher)
> Worse, I've discovered that each swap between the matte and photo black
> ink cartridges and the ensuing lng nozzle-cleaning routine gobbles
> up some 10 euros (15 USD) worth of ink. Epson being what they are, they
> won't just clean the bla
On Mar 12, 2008, at 8:21 PM, Mat Maessen wrote:
>>> You mean as large as you want up to 32 inches long per image... ;-)
>> True. There is a limit. I wasn't sure if that was true of the R2400.
>> I know it was true of the 2200.
>>>
> I think it's a function of Epson's print drivers. I hit the sam
On Mar 12, 2008, at 8:43 PM, David Savage wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The problem? I can't use the heaps of Epson Photo Paper I still
>> have.
>> This is particularly bitter for the Panorama size (21 x 60 cm) as
>> they
>>
Ralf: I don't own a printer yet, so can't help with advice, but I want to
say hi. :-) Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf R. Radermacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Mailingliste"
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 5:49 PM
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Christine Aguila
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ralf: I don't own a printer yet, so can't help with advice, but I want to
> say hi. :-) Cheers, Christine
Mark!
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml
16 matches
Mail list logo
