So far I haven't seen such a regulation proposed, nor can I imagine how
it could be reasonably enforced.
graywolf wrote:
> Ah, but the problem is that Mr Joe Littleguy is a lot easier to regulate than
> Mr Big Industry Lobbiest. Now of course their are only about 0.1% as many
> folks doing chem
Ah, but the problem is that Mr Joe Littleguy is a lot easier to regulate than
Mr Big Industry Lobbiest. Now of course their are only about 0.1% as many folks
doing chemical based photography, but that never did stop the lawmakers from
doing their thing. In fact they like it because they are not
Rebekah wrote:
>> So, I guess the best thing is to talk to a local lab (mini or
>> otherwise) and see if they'll take the used fix for proper disposal
>> according to whatever the local law is.
>>
>
> Thanks, I'll see if anyone around here will take it :o)
>
> rg2
>
>
>
I think you guys ar
>So, I guess the best thing is to talk to a local lab (mini or
>otherwise) and see if they'll take the used fix for proper disposal
>according to whatever the local law is.
Thanks, I'll see if anyone around here will take it :o)
rg2
On 9/8/07, Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If silver
If silver oxide is such a toxin, why do we still value and use silverware?
OTOH, if you process enough, silver recovery can net you some small change.
Regards,
Bob...
"Life isn't like a box of chocolates . .
it's more like a jar of jalape
5 matches
Mail list logo
