If you are using windows there is an unofficial driver for Nikon Scan v4 -
https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/unoffical-vista-x64-driver-of-ls-8000ed-9000ed-for-nikon-scan-4-03.356066/
I'm running it with my LS8000 on Win10 x64. The Vista driver in that
post works fine, but you have to suspe
I did buy glass holders :)
On 12 December 2017 at 12:36, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Rob Studdert wrote:
>
>>It's a good machine, can be improved a bit though, I added black flock
>>and matt paint internally on surfaces prone to reflection and upped
>>the contrast a little.
>
> Did you come up with an
Rob Studdert wrote:
>It's a good machine, can be improved a bit though, I added black flock
>and matt paint internally on surfaces prone to reflection and upped
>the contrast a little.
Did you come up with any tricks for keeping medium format film flat?
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multime
It's a good machine, can be improved a bit though, I added black flock
and matt paint internally on surfaces prone to reflection and upped
the contrast a little.
On 12 December 2017 at 08:57, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Zos Xavius wrote:
>
>>Damn. Lucky SOB. None of the sub 2k scanners compare. You g
Zos Xavius wrote:
>Damn. Lucky SOB. None of the sub 2k scanners compare. You got a steal.
I can't tell you how long I let my cursor hover over the "Buy It Now"
button while I an internal debate "Is it for real or is it a scam?"
raged in my head. But the buyer checked out and I went for it. An
Damn. Lucky SOB. None of the sub 2k scanners compare. You got a steal.
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> ...really is true.
>
> Like a Nikon CoolScan LS-8000 medium format film scanner (4000dpi) for
> $1200.
>
> I've seen them going for far more than that. In fact, I've seen t
Like the scene and the exposure, Mark.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 10, 2017, at 1:34 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Another archived slide, courtesy of my new LS8000 scanner:
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d503202.jpg
>
> Wisteria in Magdalen College, Oxford.
> Pentax MX, SMC-M 50mm f/1.4
Another archived slide, courtesy of my new LS8000 scanner:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d503202.jpg
Wisteria in Magdalen College, Oxford.
Pentax MX, SMC-M 50mm f/1.4, Kodak E100SW.
No idea what the shutter speed and aperture might have been :-)
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
ww
On Dec 10, 2017, at 6:45 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> High resolution scans take a looong time. No big surprise, I suppose.
> The IEEE 1394 interface is pointless, from a speed standpoint: The
> bottleneck as far as scanning speed is concerned is *not* the transfer
> of data from the scanner to the
Jan van Wijk wrote:
>What are you using to run the scanner, the Nikkon Software, or vuescan perhaps?
>And is that on Windows or Mac ?
I'm using VueScan.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/l
Hi Mark,
On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 12:45:46 -0500 Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>This scanner is friggin' HUGE. Around double the size (volume) of my
>previous medium format scanner the Minolta Scan Multi. I thought it
>might be a little bigger than the Minolta but never imagined anything
>like this. Amazing.
ann sanfedele wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/2017-12-08-0002.jpg
>
>That's a gorgeous shot! scan didn't let you down, either -- now you
>can redo some others :-)
Here's a 100% crop from a tiny bit of the center:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/crop.jpg
Other notes:
This scanner
That's a gorgeous shot! scan didn't let you down, either -- now you
can redo some others :-)
ann
On 12/9/2017 10:56 AM, John wrote:
Me too, even though I already have a CoolScan-IV ED.
On 12/8/2017 22:41, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Excellent! I’m jealous!
Paul
On Dec 8, 2017, at 8:55 PM, Mark
Me too, even though I already have a CoolScan-IV ED.
On 12/8/2017 22:41, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Excellent! I’m jealous!
Paul
On Dec 8, 2017, at 8:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
...really is true.
Like a Nikon CoolScan LS-8000 medium format film scanner (4000dpi) for
$1200.
I've seen them going
Excellent! I’m jealous!
Paul
> On Dec 8, 2017, at 8:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> ...really is true.
>
> Like a Nikon CoolScan LS-8000 medium format film scanner (4000dpi) for
> $1200.
>
> I've seen them going for far more than that. In fact, I've seen the
> film carriers alone listed for $8
...really is true.
Like a Nikon CoolScan LS-8000 medium format film scanner (4000dpi) for
$1200.
I've seen them going for far more than that. In fact, I've seen the
film carriers alone listed for $800! (No scanner included.) Yeah,
that's a bit unrealistic, but 1200 bucks for the scanner in excell
Should that be a MARK, Mark?
:-)a
On 9/13/2017 9:56 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
ooh very nice!
How conventional of you :-)
Hey! I might take offense to that!
;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIB
tistic purposes, to combine multiple images to expand the
> time being captured in the image and produce a specific effect. But
> I've discovered that every once in a while HDR is useful for...
> getting high dynamic range. Who'd a thunk?
>
> Anyway, here's a 3-shot HDR of
ann sanfedele wrote:
>ooh very nice!
>
>How conventional of you :-)
Hey! I might take offense to that!
;-)
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
I've discovered that every once in a while HDR is useful for...
getting high dynamic range. Who'd a thunk?
Anyway, here's a 3-shot HDR of the entrance to Christchurch (one of
the colleges in Oxford):
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dc01263-26nat1.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
So. Most of the time you know I (and I realize this is just me) use
HDR for artistic purposes, to combine multiple images to expand the
time being captured in the image and produce a specific effect. But
I've discovered that every once in a while HDR is useful for...
getting high dynamic
21 matches
Mail list logo
