Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-25 Thread Larry Colen
Rick Womer wrote: Some might think Larry is over exposed ! ;-)<< He certainly would be if Bruce W ever shot his portrait. Why not, everyone else is asking photographers to work for exposure. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Disc

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-25 Thread Larry Colen
Steve Cottrell wrote: http://i2.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article2051183.ece/ALTERNATES/s1227b/ PEOPLE-ONLY-Michael-OBrien.jpg Are you volunteering to be the one holding it? Any culinary references are left as an exercise for the student. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) ht

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-25 Thread Jack Davis
That exposure is a mystery? J Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 25, 2016, at 9:34 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote: > > On 25/4/16, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> I'd make him wear a hat. > > > Like this > > > PEO

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-25 Thread Bruce Walker
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Ken Waller wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Bruce Walker >> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Rick Womer >>> wrote: >> >> Some might think Larry is over exposed ! ;-) << He certainly would be if Bruce W ever shot his

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-25 Thread Steve Cottrell
On 25/4/16, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed: >I'd make him wear a hat. Like this -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production ---

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-25 Thread Ken Waller
Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Zos Xavius" Subject: Re: Exposure mystery i can't believe i missed that joke. not enough coffee yet. please accept my apologies. it finally hit me lol. On Mon, Apr 25, 2

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-25 Thread Zos Xavius
i can't believe i missed that joke. not enough coffee yet. please accept my apologies. it finally hit me lol. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Bruce Walker wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Some might think Larry is over exposed ! ;-) << >> >> He certainly would b

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-25 Thread Bruce Walker
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Rick Womer wrote: >>>Some might think Larry is over exposed ! ;-) << > > He certainly would be if Bruce W ever shot his portrait. I'd make him wear a hat. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-25 Thread Rick Womer
- >>From: Steve Cottrell >>Sent: Apr 24, 2016 1:08 PM >>To: pentax list >>Subject: Re: Exposure mystery >> >>On 24/4/16, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >>>I have Larry on all of my Dslr's and sometimes on my new X30 >> >&

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-25 Thread Steve Cottrell
On 25/4/16, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >But as to the actual question ... seems to me I had something like that >> >happen - though my feeble memory is saying it was only when I was using >> >flash fill >> >> Ahhh - a flash fill Larry. I think Wheatfield Willie will know, so gi

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread Mark Stringer
Is there a "best practices" on initial settings? I saw a youtube video and some settings were done to eliminate random unsharp photos. Nothing about random exposure problems. If anyone knows of such and article or other videos I'd like to review them as the K3II is still somewhat new to me.

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread mike wilson
> On 24 April 2016 at 23:26 Steve Cottrell wrote: > > > On 24/4/16, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >But as to the actual question ... seems to me I had something like that > >happen - though my feeble memory is saying it was only when I was using > >flash fill > > Ahhh - a fl

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread Steve Cottrell
On 24/4/16, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed: >But as to the actual question ... seems to me I had something like that >happen - though my feeble memory is saying it was only when I was using >flash fill Ahhh - a flash fill Larry. I think Wheatfield Willie will know, so give him a MARK

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread ann sanfedele
Cotty, YOu are so sharp! But as to the actual question ... seems to me I had something like that happen - though my feeble memory is saying it was only when I was using flash fill ann On 4/24/2016 1:08 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote: On 24/4/16, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: I ha

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread Ken Waller
Some might think Larry is over exposed ! ;-) -Original Message- >From: Steve Cottrell >Sent: Apr 24, 2016 1:08 PM >To: pentax list >Subject: Re: Exposure mystery > >On 24/4/16, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>I have Larry on all of my Dslr&#x

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread Zos Xavius
That camera did you a favor. The underexposed one is the only one without a blown sky. :) EXIF looks the same on all shots. It must have been an aperture lever error. It happens. If it becomes a regular occurrence I would be concerned. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.n

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread David J Brooks
miss one , and all hell breaks loose.:-) On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote: > On 24/4/16, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>I have Larry on all of my Dslr's and sometimes on my new X30 > > So am I given to understand that a single darkened exposure over a > serie

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread Larry Colen
Mark Roberts wrote: David J Brooks wrote: I have Larry on all of my Dslr's and sometimes on my new X30 If I had Larry on all my DSLR's I'd probably give up photography and take up something less surreal. Fortunately, being weathersealed, most Pentax DSLRs are easy to clean. -- Larry

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread Mark Roberts
David J Brooks wrote: >I have Larry on all of my Dslr's and sometimes on my new X30 If I had Larry on all my DSLR's I'd probably give up photography and take up something less surreal. -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com --- This email has been checked for virus

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread Steve Cottrell
On 24/4/16, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: >I have Larry on all of my Dslr's and sometimes on my new X30 So am I given to understand that a single darkened exposure over a series of rapid-fire exposures - which to my knowledge has never been named before - hsould be henceforth known

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread Toine
The second exposure appears to be sharper. Maybe the aperture was set to f8 - f11 due to some error in the camera. On 24 April 2016 at 18:48, David J Brooks wrote: > I have Larry on all of my Dslr's and sometimes on my new X30 > > Dave > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Larry Colen wrote: >>

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread David J Brooks
I have Larry on all of my Dslr's and sometimes on my new X30 Dave On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > Last week we were showing an out of town visitor the sights. I did a rapid > fire series of frames on a wave crashing, all shot at ISO 100, f/5.6 1/1000 > of a second. The se

Re: Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread Steve Cottrell
On 24/4/16, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed: >Last week we were showing an out of town visitor the sights. I did a >rapid fire series of frames on a wave crashing, all shot at ISO 100, >f/5.6 1/1000 of a second. The second exposure in the set of four is >about a stop darker than the ot

Exposure mystery

2016-04-24 Thread Larry Colen
Last week we were showing an out of town visitor the sights. I did a rapid fire series of frames on a wave crashing, all shot at ISO 100, f/5.6 1/1000 of a second. The second exposure in the set of four is about a stop darker than the other three. https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/7