Hi Peter,
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 10:56:22 -0800 (PST), Peter Jansen wrote:
Has anyone had experience with the FA* 300mm f2.8
the 1.4xL 2xL converters?
Not with the FA*, but I have used both -L converters
with the manual focus A* 300mm f/2.8
The results are quite good, no vignetting and very
Peter wrote:
I'm looking for a lighter less $$$ big lense by
using teleconverters with a FA* 300mm f2.8 instead of
buying the FA* 600mm f4, but I still want high image
quality.
You can keep looking forever. High image quality with a 2X converter has never been
achieved in spite of what
I disagree. You can achieve very good image quality with any of the late
model Pentax converters, such as the L2X-S, the A2X-S or the 1.4 X
equivelants, and good Pentax glass. I know I've done it. If you wish,
I'll show you some sharp and contrasty examples.
Paul Stenquist
Pål Jensen wrote:
The Pentax Japan web site mentions the A1.4X-L is particular good for the
FA*300/2.8, and the A2X-L is particular good for FA*200/2.8. I have no
personal experience though.
regards,
Alan Chan
Hello
Has anyone had experience with the FA* 300mm f2.8
the 1.4xL 2xL converters?
I know that Paal
4 matches
Mail list logo
