> Hm, not a sin...
> In my case I'm not shure about that. I've long been using the M 85/2.0
> and now have the FA*85/1.4 - do I still need the M 85/2?
> Not shure...
> What would one get for such lens?
One could get as much as $50! Send me your M85, I'll send you a check
immediately!
No?
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Th. Stach wrote:
> In my case I'm not shure about that. I've long been using the M 85/2.0
> and now have the FA*85/1.4 - do I still need the M 85/2?
> Not shure...
> What would one get for such lens?
Lately they've been selling on the PDML for around $200-$250 US.
chris
Mike Johnston schrieb:
>
> > Oh, oh, oh, I know exactly how you feel!
> > I have a 77 ltd an M85/2 and an 85/1.8
> > I know that one has to go and that it has to be the 85/1.8 but I just can't
> > make myself do it.
>
> Well then DON'T! It's not a _sin_ to have three different medium telephotos,
>
> I am considering selling the following lenses; most in very good condition
> unless otherwise noted:
>[snip]
> 85/1.8 TBD Still not sure I can bear to part with it.
Johnston's Seventh Law of Photography: "Never sell a good lens."
--Lawbreaker Mike
> Oh, oh, oh, I know exactly how you feel!
> I have a 77 ltd an M85/2 and an 85/1.8
> I know that one has to go and that it has to be the 85/1.8 but I just can't
> make myself do it.
Well then DON'T! It's not a _sin_ to have three different medium telephotos,
you know.
--Mike
Stan,
Your ambivalence toward selling the 85/1.8K tells you all you need to know.
Don't do it! You'll regret it.
I sold my 85/1.8 screwmount, and even though I don't like using screwmount
adapters, that lens was simply the best-built lens I've ever used; I still
mourn for it. At least the screwmou
At 06:47 PM 02/03/2003 -0500, Stan wrote:
85/1.8 TBD Still not sure I can bear to part with it.
Oh, oh, oh, I know exactly how you feel!
I have a 77 ltd an M85/2 and an 85/1.8
I know that one has to go and that it has to be the 85/1.8 but I just can't
make myself do it.
Wendy Beard,
Ottawa, Can
7 matches
Mail list logo
