- Original Message -
From: "Rick Womer"
Subject: Re: FS - K10D Body Kit
My impressions are a bit different than Peter’s.
I had an ist-D, and went from that to a K10D. It provided a distinct
advantage in image quality in tonality as well as megapixels. The only
problem wit
rt to take care of my equipment - I've got
several lenses purchased new in 1988 that are still in use and have never
been serviced.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling"
Subject: Re: FS - K10D Body Kit
My impressions are a bit different than Peter’s.
I had an ist-D, and went from that to a K10D. It provided a distinct advantage
in image quality in tonality as well as megapixels. The only problem with the
K10D was that noise became bothersome at ISO 800, and night shots at ISO 1600
(the
I skipped the K10D, when it came out. The K100D used pretty much same,
though improved, probably in manufacturing, guts as the *ist Ds series,
if you compare the specifications they were damned near identical.
The K10D had roughly 60% more MP than the*ist-Ds but linear resolution
was only a
How does the image quality compare to the k100 and the k20?
On October 25, 2018 8:53:10 PM PDT, Ken Waller wrote:
>Looking to sell a very slightly used K10D body. Has 2590 shutter
>clicks.
>Complete with original box and all items originally contained in the
>box,
>including battery.
Looking to sell a very slightly used K10D body. Has 2590 shutter clicks.
Complete with original box and all items originally contained in the box,
including battery.
Absolutely no wear visible.
I bought this K10D late in its product cycle, a few months before the K20D
was available. I
6 matches
Mail list logo
