Re: FS Friday (late): Screw Mount gem - Super Takumar 28mm f/3.5

2005-04-02 Thread Keith Whaley
Joe Wilensky wrote: Is it the 35mm f/3.5 or the 28mm f/3.5? The photo looks like it shows the 35/3.5 lens. Joe That's what it looked like to me, Joe. When I expanded my screen image, I thought it said, "3.5/35", in that order. keith On Apr 2, 2005, at 7:25 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: Super Takumar 2

Re: FS Friday (late): Screw Mount gem - Super Takumar 28mm f/3.5

2005-04-02 Thread Joe Wilensky
Is it the 35mm f/3.5 or the 28mm f/3.5? The photo looks like it shows the 35/3.5 lens. Joe On Apr 2, 2005, at 7:25 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: Super Takumar 28mm f/3.5 in LN- condition. I think the lens cap must have come from another lens at some point because it has a couple of scrapes, whereas the

FS Friday (late): Screw Mount gem - Super Takumar 28mm f/3.5

2005-04-02 Thread Mark Roberts
Super Takumar 28mm f/3.5 in LN- condition. I think the lens cap must have come from another lens at some point because it has a couple of scrapes, whereas the lens itself and the hard case are like new. Really beautiful example of why the screw mount Takumars have such a stellar reputation. http://