.
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Rubenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:08 PM
Subject: RE: Film SLR's are dead - was: Pentax Folks
> A couple of times my family has gone rafting, so I bought w
A couple of times my family has gone rafting, so I bought water proof
disposables. They served their purpose of saving visual memories, which is
all that the vast majority of people want from pictures anyway. For the
image quality desired of many folks disposable cameras are over kill. I am
not th
From: "Tom Sapienza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: Film SLR's are dead - was: Pentax Folks
> I think it pretty much gets recycled right away. At least, the impression
> I've been unde
> You can get 'em all sorts of ways 35mm or APS format, color at least 400
> to 800 speed, with flash or without, waterproof or panoramic or plain,
> and B&W, too. Prices seem to range from $2-3 up to $13 U.S. My son was
> carrying around a $3 Fuji 27 exposure 400 speed with flash Sat, Sun, and
>
You can get 'em all sorts of ways 35mm or APS format, color at least 400
to 800 speed, with flash or without, waterproof or panoramic or plain,
and B&W, too. Prices seem to range from $2-3 up to $13 U.S. My son was
carrying around a $3 Fuji 27 exposure 400 speed with flash Sat, Sun, and
Monday
Actually, I think that disposable cameras are one of the things that is
going to keep 35mm alive for quite a while. It's hard to come up with a
digitial equivalent that will have anywhere near as much profit margin.
Funny how we've come full circle. This is similar to how the first
Brownies wer
6 matches
Mail list logo
