Picasa has a nice viewer that works in windows explorer instead of the
default viewer, can display dng and pef and the whole thing is free
why wait for a codec?
Alastair
On 20 August 2011 06:06, Thibouille wrote:
> I agree Darren, it's just that it is IMO unacceptable that Adobe does
> not prov
I agree Darren, it's just that it is IMO unacceptable that Adobe does
not provide this for free.
Just because they want M$ to support it is no justification and their
stupid game is pissing me off.
2011/8/19 Darren Addy :
> Looks like the current version has been there since May 3rd of this year.
Looks like the current version has been there since May 3rd of this year.
Still, with the metadata issue, the performance issue, and the
additional functionality, I'm not sure why THIS wouldn't be worth the
$15 measly bucks:
http://www.fastpictureviewer.com/codecs/
-D
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mai
You're welcome ;)
Still, 3 years (or about) that DNG's there and Adobe still can't make
a complete codec but third parties can (and not for free of course)...
sometimes Adobe really are a bunch of morons :(
2011/8/19 Jos from Holland :
> Finally! It works, I am happy!
> Thanks for posting.
> Jos
Finally! It works, I am happy!
Thanks for posting.
Jos
On 19-8-2011 14:02, Thibouille wrote:
Just noticed it, maybe I just missed it before.
http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Codec
Almost useable because metadata isn't supported (bummer!), because it
won't work with Vista.
It'll work wi
Just noticed it, maybe I just missed it before.
http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/DNG_Codec
Almost useable because metadata isn't supported (bummer!), because it
won't work with Vista.
It'll work with Win7 including 64bit version, though.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
6 matches
Mail list logo
