ber 2005 13:15
> To: Pentax Discuss
> Subject: GESO: Lavender Bay and Louis Tillet
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
> no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
> mirror slap isn'
Hi!
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
mirror slap isn't that critical).
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index5/05_11_lavender/10.htm
Frankly (no pun intended), I think it does not
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/28/05, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
mirror slap isn't that critical).
http://members.iinet.net.au/~der
In a message dated 11/28/2005 4:16:54 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
mirror slap isn't that critical).
http://members.iinet.
Even if the mirror rattled for nearly a
second, shaking the camera like a leaf,
it would still be only ~3% of the
exposure time -- nothing at all to worry
about.
Don
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/28/05, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated
On 11/28/05, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
> no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
> mirror slap isn't that critical).
>
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index5/05_11
Hi all,
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
mirror slap isn't that critical).
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index5/05_11_lavender/10.htm
and some casual shots of Louis Tillet at hi
7 matches
Mail list logo
