This one was my favourite for inclusion in the book, with the other two
just making up the numbers.
But it is the editor's job to put together a cohesive collection and of
course Mark has a different perspective, probably more objective in this
case, than me.
K10D DA* 50-135mm ISO 1000 1/25sec (
Graydon wrote:
> I rejected this one by not sending it in:
> http://picasaweb.google.ca/lh/photo/Sq0e0U5ChP1EJoH8TViR2A?feat=directlink
>
> These two were rejected by the editors, presumptively because they're
> not cormorants:
> http://picasaweb.google.ca/lh/photo/1kGTPYcvc64EnB7H2hafow?f
I rejected this one by not sending it in:
http://picasaweb.google.ca/lh/photo/Sq0e0U5ChP1EJoH8TViR2A?feat=directlink
These two were rejected by the editors, presumptively because they're
not cormorants:
http://picasaweb.google.ca/lh/photo/1kGTPYcvc64EnB7H2hafow?feat=directlink
http://picasaweb.goo
At 5:00 PM -0700 5/9/10, Tim Bray wrote:
2010/5/9 Steve Sharpe :
Here's one of mine -
http://earth.delith.com/bluenoseflag.html
Obviously you picked the wrong country. -T
I wondered about that...
;-)
(I think we should follow the quickly-established tradition of
pointing out each re
At 1:07 AM +0200 5/10/10, eckinator wrote:
2010/5/10 Bruce Walker :
My reject:
http://decluttr.com/3898189541
No wonder with all that orange peel distortion, especially in the
center of the image - looks like your lens coating may be coming loose
Cheers
Ecke
Here's one of mine -
http://
5 matches
Mail list logo