an had to do it !
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: GFM Winners
>
>
> > In a message dated 6/20/2007 2:01:59 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Walter Hamler wrote
> Interesting, most of the winners are close ups. You look good up there,
> Ken.
> Marnie aka Doe :-)
Thanks Marnie - it was tough, but some Pentaxian had to do it !
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GFM Winners
> In a
In a message dated 6/20/2007 2:01:59 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Walter Hamler wrote:
>The GFM website has the winning pics posted as well as info on next
>years event.
Cool!
http://www.grandfather.com/planning_your_visit/events/npw2007.php
==
Interestin
ks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GFM Winners
>I suppose thats true:-)
>
> Atleast i had one that made the dishonourable mention list.
>
> I'm happy with that, and i was taught something.
>
> Dave
>
> On 6/20/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED
(to borrow a New York Daily News headline when the Brooklyn Dodgers finally
> won the world series.)
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Subject: Re: GFM Winners
>
>
> > Next year.;-
> Next year.;-)
>
> Dave
This is next year !
(to borrow a New York Daily News headline when the Brooklyn Dodgers finally
won the world series.)
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GFM Winners
> Nex
Next year.;-)
Dave
On 6/20/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Walter Hamler wrote:
>
> >The GFM website has the winning pics posted as well as info on next
> >years event.
>
> Cool!
>
> http://www.grandfather.com/planning_your_visit/events/npw2007.php
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss
Walter Hamler wrote:
>The GFM website has the winning pics posted as well as info on next
>years event.
Cool!
http://www.grandfather.com/planning_your_visit/events/npw2007.php
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The GFM website has the winning pics posted as well as info on next years
event.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi!
Thanks Boris. I liked the Sea of Galilee image that you posted recently. I
think I like it better with about 1/4 cropped off of the bottom making it
more of a panoramic image. There doesn't seem to be a lot of interesting
subject in the bottom 1/4. How do those trees survive out there in th
On 16 Jun 2005 at 21:56, Herb Chong wrote:
> a tad on the expensive side for the average photographer, no?
> a tad on the expensive side for the average photographer, no?
Maybe but fine for a photo-club or association, no?
A good set of Leica projectors and lenses used to cost quite a lot too y
a tad on the expensive side for the average photographer, no?
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: Posted GFM winners and recent work, comments welcome
A couple of the Greta
On 16 Jun 2005 at 8:17, Mark Roberts wrote:
> The GFM computer expert (Scott Nelson) says that the biggest drawback to
> most current computer projection systems is color. (I have no idea how
> you'd calibrate them - obviously a Colorvision spyder wouldn't work!)
> Apparently, most of them under $
"Charles Braswell Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks for the compliments. That big screen at GFM really does show the
>colors well from the transparencies and make them pop. I got to get me one
>of those for here at home : )
The GFM computer expert (Scott Nelson) says that the biggest drawba
> Boris Liberman
> Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:48:58 -0700
> That would be right... "I am ummm clumsy"
> Jar Boris Jar Binks...
Thanks Boris. I liked the Sea of Galilee image that you posted recently. I
think I like it better with about 1/4 cropped off of the bottom making it
more of a panoramic image.
> frank theriault
> Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:42:44 -0700
> I have yet to look at other comments, so I don't know if anyone else
> has mentioned it, but looking at these on a computer screen simply
> does not do these photos justice. The seeing your winners projected
> on a great big screen at GFM is t
Hi!
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. I think you are saying that
you learned a few things from my presentation and it was very interesting?
Thanks for commenting.
That would be right... "I am ummm clumsy"
Jar Boris Jar Binks...
On 6/14/05, Charles Braswell Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ann requested that I post my winning slides from GFM so here they are. They
> are mixed in with some images that I've taken in the past week (the GFM
> winners are so labeled). The original images from the competiti
> Boris Liberman
> Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:20:27 -0700
> Charles, with your permission I learned few things from your presentation.
Very interesting...
Hi Boris,
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. I think you are saying that
you learned a few things from my presentation and it was very i
Hi!
Ann requested that I post my winning slides from GFM so here they are. They
are mixed in with some images that I've taken in the past week (the GFM
winners are so labeled). The original images from the competition are Fuji
Velvia slides, all the others were taken with my digital c
> Tom Reese
> Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:44:53 -0700
> Did you get your winning slides back from the 2005 NPW?
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the kind words. I got my third place and honorable mention slides
back the day of the competition. They kept the Best of Show slide to print
for the wall display (the one I
Charles Braswell Jr wrote:
Those having trouble might try this index link:
http://www.ncimages.com/Flowers062005/
Very nice work Charles.
Did you get your winning slides back from the 2005 NPW?
Tom Reese
> One of the secrets might be that many of the pictures with droplets
> reflect what appear to be identical unnatural light sources, i.e. soft
> box or something similar. That would help punch up alot of the
> colors/contrast and give a more diffuse look.
Good eye Gonz, I compliment your ability
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Kostas wrote:
> Aye, give me his tools and I will...
Hi Kostas,
Thanks so much for the kind words, I really enjoy macro/micro photography.
Give me a bellows and I can spend a lot of time in a small area.
Thanks again,
Charles
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Gonz wrote:
One of the secrets might be that many of the pictures with droplets reflect
what appear to be identical unnatural light sources, i.e. soft box or
something similar. That would help punch up alot of the colors/contrast and
give a more diffuse look.
In my natu
ted that I post my winning slides
from GFM so here they are. They
are mixed in with some images that I've taken in the past week (the GFM
winners are so labeled). The original images from the competition are Fuji
Velvia slides, all the others were taken with my digital camera using a
Pentax 70-21
> Hey, I wasn't involved that year, I just heard the story... recounted by
> Don and Doug with much delight!
> --
> Mark Roberts
Okay. Couldn't remember who all was involved in that underhanded plot : )
Charles
Hi Dave,
> Once again, i was very glad to have met you at GFM thius year.
> For some reason i can only open the winning picture.
Great meeting you too! Looking forward to seeing you next year. Those having
trouble might try this index link: http://www.ncimages.com/Flowers062005/
> My mouth dropp
"Charles Braswell Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Then there is the year that I got back 36 unexposed slides...you
>rascals.
Hey, I wasn't involved that year, I just heard the story... recounted by
Don and Doug with much delight!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
> I also suspect that the experienced photographers use a lot of film,
> take notes, and choose the roll which they believe contains the best
> shots for processing. After all, the rules say (said) that you can only
> *submit* one roll, there's no limit to how many you *shoot*, and you're
> allowed
> Aah so! That is how to do it. Switch Velvia for the cheap stuff they
furnish. The folks who used the Elitechrome didn't stand a chance.*
> *Anyone who believes the this is pretty dumb although it might make a
difference better two otherwise equal images.
Hi Tom,
Now you know my secret : )
Ser
Graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Aah so! That is how to do it. Switch Velvia for the cheap stuff they furnish.
>The folks who used the Elitechrome didn't stand a chance.
Well statistically this is true: I think all the winners in the
Experienced division (the entries an all categories are di
o.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Charles Braswell Jr wrote:
Ann requested that I post my winning slides from GFM so here they are. They
are mixed in with some images that I've taken in the past week (the GFM
winners are so la
r and pry those secrets.
Dave Brooks
> Ann requested that I post my winning
slides
from GFM so here they are. They
> are mixed in with some images that I've taken in the past week (the GFM
> winners are so labeled). The original images f
Charles Braswell Jr wrote:
>
> Ann requested that I post my winning slides from GFM so here they are. They
> are mixed in with some images that I've taken in the past week (the GFM
> winners are so labeled). The original images from the competition are Fuji
> Velvia slides,
Ann requested that I post my winning slides from GFM so here they are. They
are mixed in with some images that I've taken in the past week (the GFM
winners are so labeled). The original images from the competition are Fuji
Velvia slides, all the others were taken with my digital camera us
36 matches
Mail list logo
