Re: Gear for Sale/ *istD question

2004-11-24 Thread Cotty
On 24/11/04, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed: > I had a >filthy sensor made worse when I used a bulb-blower that, unknown to me, >my 18 month old daughter had been sticking up her nose and sucking snot >out, and ended up blowing baby snot all over the inside of my camera. ROTFL!! Gross

Re: Gear for Sale/ *istD question

2004-11-24 Thread Christian
TIMOTHY STARK wrote on 11/23/2004, 7:51 PM: > > Have any of the *istD shooters run into the "ccd dust issue" and is it > really an issue when switching lenses? So when I get one of the > digital bodies, should I go with a zoom to minimize lens changes? If > yes does anyone want my FA 24, 35

Re: Gear for Sale/ *istD question

2004-11-24 Thread John Whittingham
Very interested in the FA 35 2.0 if you go down the zoom route. John -- Original Message --- From: Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:01:59 -0500 (GMT-05:00) Subject: Re: Gear for Sale/ *istD question > Timothy, > I shot

Re: Gear for Sale/ *istD question

2004-11-24 Thread Kenneth Waller
y removed/attached the lenses (just like I do with film cameras). Kenneth Waller -Original Message- From: TIMOTHY STARK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Gear for Sale/ *istD question I am an occaisional lurker from Vancouver BC. I have a shelf full of 645 gear I am no longer using. T

Re: Gear for Sale/ *istD question

2004-11-24 Thread brooksdj
Hi Tim. Someone was looking for 645 stuff here not to long ago.They may contact you. As far as dust on the ccd,some of the istD owners have complained,and i had a bad problem with my D1 but so far not with the D2h. Zooms actually inhance the problem if they are internal focus,as they tend to mo

Re: Gear for Sale/ *istD question

2004-11-23 Thread Peter J. Alling
And about that Florida property... arnie wrote: dust is definitely an issue i'll take the 35, 77 and 300 arnie - Original Message - From: "TIMOTHY STARK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:51 PM Subject: Gear for Sa

Re: Gear for Sale/ *istD question

2004-11-23 Thread Paul Stenquist
Dust isn't a problem if you're careful. I wouldn't change lenses in a sandstorm without putting the camera under my coat, but in normal conditions it's not a problem. Cleaning the sensor is fairly easy as well. I blow mine off with a sterile ear syringe about once a week or so. It appears to be

Re: Gear for Sale/ *istD question

2004-11-23 Thread arnie
dust is definitely an issue i'll take the 35, 77 and 300 arnie - Original Message - From: "TIMOTHY STARK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:51 PM Subject: Gear for Sale/ *istD question I am an occaisional lurker

Re: Gear for Sale/ *istD question

2004-11-23 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "TIMOTHY STARK" Subject: Gear for Sale/ *istD question Have any of the *istD shooters run into the "ccd dust issue" and is it really an issue when switching lenses? So when I get one of the digital bodies, should I go with a zoom to m

Gear for Sale/ *istD question

2004-11-23 Thread TIMOTHY STARK
I am an occaisional lurker from Vancouver BC. I have a shelf full of 645 gear I am no longer using. This includes mint: 300mm 4.0 ED IF and 35mm 3.5 Very clean, no dings or scratches: 55 2.8, 150 3.5 clean with some marking: 645 body, 75mm 2.8 (not LS), 120 film holder. If anyone wishes to con