On Oct 3, 2014, at 11:18 , P.J. Alling wrote:
> On 10/1/2014 3:34 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
>> On Sep 22, 2014, at 13:23 , Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I hate digital photography!
>>> With a digital camera, I am producing to many photographs to be able to
On 10/1/2014 3:34 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Sep 22, 2014, at 13:23 , Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Yes, I hate digital photography!
With a digital camera, I am producing to many photographs to be able to
deal with.
Even though I take photographs only a few days a month, they come in "bursts
On Oct 2, 2014, at 8:34 am, Charles Robinson wrote:
> Simple solution: Get yourself a 512-meg SD card and you'll only be able to
> shoot about "1 roll of film" before you're done.
I should try that just for fun... I think I have a 32 or 64Mb one somewhere.
Which reminds me, I'd better get out
On Sep 22, 2014, at 15:44 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> I don't actually delete those I don't get to, though. They remain in my
> archives in case I want to wander through them and see if there's something I
> missed worth processing, now and then.
>
I do this too.
However, last night I rea
On Sep 22, 2014, at 13:23 , Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> Yes, I hate digital photography!
> With a digital camera, I am producing to many photographs to be able to
> deal with.
> Even though I take photographs only a few days a month, they come in "bursts"
> of severa
I've never been able to throw out photos, even the 99% that are crap. It's not
so bad with the digital stuff as the 2Tb of storage I have will probably last
me forever, but I am still trying to convince myself to do something with all
of my old prints.
Cheers,
Dave
On Oct 1, 2014, at 2:11 pm,
In the words of Sir Arthur Thomas Quiller-Couch, "Murder your
darlings". Use that delete key and use it often. Get rid of your
substandard (below *your* standards) shots and move on.
The more you do this the better your work will become, the less you'll
shoot and the less you'll need to delete.
u cannot queue tasks in LR (at least in LR 3.x and 4.x, don't know
about 5.x). LR always runs the jobs in parallel, and if those jobs are
similar in nature (different imports or generation of different
web-galleries), it's inefficient, and occasionally LR gets stuck.
Again, thanks
Candice just sent me this link to a tutorial on combining LR catalogs
http://tv.adobe.com/watch/the-complete-picture-with-julieanne-kost/lr3-merging-individual-lightroom-catalogs-into-a-master-catalog-/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
On 22 Sep 2014, at 23:55, steve harley wrote:
>
> on 2014-09-22 15:23 Larry Colen wrote
>> (unless they are rated 1 star, no redeeming value)
>
> pardon me for a philosophical detour — are stars a measure of goodness, or is
> it a 1-5 scale of really bad, somewhat bad, neutral, somewhat good, r
subject doesn't show up in any of the higher rated shots.
6. Try to avoid commitments in the first place!
stan
On Sep 22, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> Yes, I hate digital photography!
> With a digital camera, I am producing to many photographs to be able to
> deal
> On Sep 22, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
>
> So what do you do when your LR catalog hits over 100k? You just keep
> adding? I'm at the point where I want to just delete everything and
> pare it all down to just portfolio worthy stuff. I have months worth
> of shots to sort and edit and qu
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 6:55 PM, steve harley wrote:
> pardon me for a philosophical detour -- are stars a measure of goodness, or
> is it a 1-5 scale of really bad, somewhat bad, neutral, somewhat good,
> really good?
Originally, a measure of quality. The first star ratings were in the 1920s in
on 2014-09-22 15:23 Larry Colen wrote
(unless they are rated 1 star, no redeeming value)
pardon me for a philosophical detour — are stars a measure of goodness, or
is it a 1-5 scale of really bad, somewhat bad, neutral, somewhat good,
really good?
since they are stars, like one gives to sch
Deleting is one of the best ways to improve your photography !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Zos Xavius"
Subject: Re: I hate digital photography!
So what do you do when your LR catalog hits over 100k? You
some redundancy.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Yes, I hate digital photography!
With a digital camera, I am producing to many photographs to be able to
deal with.
Even though I take photographs only a few days a
On 9/22/2014 2:23 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Yes, I hate digital photography!
With a digital camera, I am producing to many photographs to be able to
deal with.
Even though I take photographs only a few days a month, they come in
"bursts" of several hundreds, and then I don't have
Zos Xavius wrote:
So what do you do when your LR catalog hits over 100k? You just keep
adding? I'm at the point where I want to just delete everything and
pare it all down to just portfolio worthy stuff. I have months worth
of shots to sort and edit and quite frankly I'm really not looking
forw
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Yes, I hate digital photography!
There are aspects of film photography that I love, particularly the
rhythm of shooting. However I love digital.
With a digital camera, I am producing to many photographs to be able to
deal with.
Even though I take photographs only a
, but for every drive I buy, I
have to buy a 2nd so I at the very least have some redundancy.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I hate digital photography!
>> With a digital camera, I am
On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> Yes, I hate digital photography!
> With a digital camera, I am producing to many photographs to be able to
> deal with.
> Even though I take photographs only a few days a month, they come in "bursts"
> of severa
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
> BTW, as for the time, - for me even just the process of copying, importing
> photos into LR
Don't wait for this to finish, start the process and do something else
while it's running.
> and doing the selecton process - already take consider
Attila
I was expecting somebody to make this type of a comment.
I thought of that myself:
1. First, I found the labs and the masters within those labs that
were suitable for me.
2. That was the limit of what was available to me
(physically, as I didn't have access to a lab myself, or financia
By the way with digital, you can still take it to the lab and have it
processed for you. You might not like what you get back, but I've had
that problem with minilabs back in the day.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
processing anyway.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> Yes, I hate digital photography!
> With a digital camera, I am producing to many photographs to be able to
> deal with.
> Even though I take photographs only a few days a month, they come in
> "bursts
Yes, I hate digital photography!
With a digital camera, I am producing to many photographs to be able to
deal with.
Even though I take photographs only a few days a month, they come
in "bursts" of several hundreds, and then I don't have time to select and
process them.
Back
26 matches
Mail list logo
