Re: Image quality in Photoshop

2006-02-12 Thread David Mann
On Feb 13, 2006, at 2:43 AM, Rob Studdert wrote: Nikon Scan 4.0 can utilize custom monitor profiles (I have it set up to use my Spyder generated profile) however output color spaces are limited so don't include all the color spaces loaded on the system. Minolta software is exactly the same

Re: Image quality in Photoshop

2006-02-12 Thread Rob Studdert
On 12 Feb 2006 at 7:03, Lon Williamson wrote: > Check color spaces, monitor calibration (is it honored in Nikon Scan?), > and how big the preview image is in NikonScan. This stuff is tricky at > first, but does sort itself out when you are persistent. Nikon Scan 4.0 can utilize custom monitor pr

Re: Image quality in Photoshop

2006-02-12 Thread Lon Williamson
Check color spaces, monitor calibration (is it honored in Nikon Scan?), and how big the preview image is in NikonScan. This stuff is tricky at first, but does sort itself out when you are persistent. What works best for me is to keep scanner software as "stupid" as possible and do virtually all

Re: Image quality in Photoshop

2006-02-11 Thread Joseph Tainter
Why is it when I open a scanned image saved as TIFF files in Photoshop the quality is much deteriorated compared to the original scan. That is, if I open the file in Nikon Scan 4.0 the image is great. In Photoshop sharpness is reduced and there are noise artefacts as well. -- I, too,

Image quality in Photoshop

2006-02-11 Thread Pål Jensen
Why is it when I open a scanned image saved as TIFF files in Photoshop the quality is much deteriorated compared to the original scan. That is, if I open the file in Nikon Scan 4.0 the image is great. In Photoshop sharpness is reduced and there are noise artefacts as well. Any idea? Pål