Patrick wrote:
>As said by someone else, don't hold your breath -- the MZ-S itself took
>nearly 6 years of this-conference-that-event rumors before it was real. I
>don't know what took them so long to perfect on it, so it was probably some
>sort of delay for the proper market.
Actually, the M
"Nitin Garg" wrote:
>The best way to merge digital and film is to make *digital film* IMO.
>Dont know if its possible. Dont think anyone is doing it :)
Yes, someone is (or perhaps, was). It's been vapor hardware for something
like 4 years now, so no need to provide a web address. Last I
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: In a nutshell - Is Pentax ever going Digital SLR
On Fri, 03 May 2002 09:00:15 +0200
Pål Audun Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a nutshell yes. Pentax is working on a K-mount digital slr. According
On Fri, 03 May 2002 09:00:15 +0200
Pål Audun Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a nutshell yes. Pentax is working on a K-mount digital slr. According to
> Pentax people, they expect something to be shown at Photokina in the fall.
Whos fall, it is fall now here in .au
Kevin
-
This message
Jeremy wrote:
>Can I be relatively confident that *at some point less than 5 years from
>now* Pentax will release a Digital SLR that can take all my nice Pentax
>lenses?
In a nutshell yes. Pentax is working on a K-mount digital slr. According to
Pentax people, they expect something to be show
The best way to merge digital and film is to make *digital film* IMO.
Dont know if its possible. Dont think anyone is doing it :)
I dont think is going to happen but a
On Thu, May 02, 1996 at 07:01:40PM -0700, Jeremy Clegg wrote:
> I have been away, so I apologize if this topic has been beat t
6 matches
Mail list logo
