photo systems seems further verified.
Jack
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Davis"
> Subject: In the same Pop Photo Issue...
>
>
> > There is, also, a Michael McNamara article in the March is
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless"
Subject: Re: In the same Pop Photo Issue...
> William Robb wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jack Davis"
>> Subject: In the same Pop Photo Issue...
>>
>> As soon as t
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Davis"
> Subject: In the same Pop Photo Issue...
>
>
>> There is, also, a Michael McNamara article in the March issue titled,
>> "Digital Wins".
>> To make his point that digi
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: In the same Pop Photo Issue...
> There is, also, a Michael McNamara article in the March issue titled,
> "Digital Wins".
> To make his point that digital noise is a less grainy image than is
> that made
There is, also, a Michael McNamara article in the March issue titled,
"Digital Wins".
To make his point that digital noise is a less grainy image than is
that made with film of the same ISO rating, he displays two thumbnail
images. He chose 1600 ISO to demonstrate.
The film image is a scan of Fujic
5 matches
Mail list logo
