This could be a useful article for the original poster...
-Original Message-
From: herb greenslade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 January 2002 23:57
To: Pentax User's group
Subject: Re: Inexpensive Photo Scanner v. PhotoCD
Just to give you my experience for neg or slide
Happy Friday!
I'm looking into getting an inexpensive scanner (right now, the leader is the Epson
1250 with photo attachment). I'm debating on going this route versus getting a
PhotoCD with my processing (both slides and color negs). I haven't had any shots made
into a PhotoCD, so I'm brand
I'm looking into getting an inexpensive scanner (right now, the leader is
the Epson 1250 with photo attachment). I'm debating on going this route
versus getting a PhotoCD with my processing (both slides and color negs). I
haven't had any shots made into a PhotoCD, so I'm brand new at this
Scanner v. PhotoCD
| Happy Friday!
|
| I'm looking into getting an inexpensive scanner (right now, the leader is the Epson
|1250 with photo attachment). I'm debating on going this route versus getting a
|PhotoCD with my processing (both slides and color negs). I haven't had any shots
|made
Jan 2002 15:58:47 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Inexpensive Photo Scanner v. PhotoCD
I'm looking into getting an inexpensive scanner (right now, the
leader is
the Epson 1250 with photo attachment). I'm debating on going this
route
versus getting a PhotoCD with my processing (both
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:36:28 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any thoughts on the PhotoCD or this scanner (or anything in the
same price range, $100-$150US) would be appreciated.
A big reason I don't do PhotoCDs is that I don't want to pay to have
images scanned that aren't up to snuff. My
with the 1650.Now
they have to get their back orders in
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:58:47 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Inexpensive Photo Scanner v. PhotoCD
I'm looking into getting an inexpensive scanner
each (paper cost). I choose to go this route as I don't want to take
the time to scan myself.
Hope this helps.
Ken Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:36 PM
Subject: Inexpensive Photo Scanner v. PhotoCD
Happy Friday
: Inexpensive Photo Scanner v. PhotoCD
A big reason I don't do PhotoCDs is that I don't want to pay to have
images scanned that aren't up to snuff. My average keeper rate is
one or two frames per roll, at most. I don't want to pay to have the
other ten, twenty, or thirty frames scanned.
TTYL
9 matches
Mail list logo
