> From: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> F4.0 and 5.6. The Sigma is noticeably sharper than the FA 24. The DA
> 16-45 at 20 mm. is also much sharper than the FA 24, and runs so close
> to the Sigma that I cannot pick a winner.
24s, especially fast 24s, appear to be rather hard to build. I
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> was so dim that I was shooting ISO 3200, 1/30 second (handheld), with
> the FA* 24 at f2.0. That's at the edge, obviously, and shows why the FA
> 20 f2.8 won't do. I will get the DA 14, but as you can see there will be
> times when it is too slow.
Yes,
2 matches
Mail list logo
