On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Miserere wrote:
>>
>> Not sure what going on, the lens worked very well with the istD and k-10d.
>>
>> Any thoughts??
>>
>>
>> Dave
>
> If it's not the SR going crazy Like P.J. suggested, then I'd say you
> have a loose lens element in the lens. That picture remi
On 22 May 2012 20:31, David J Brooks wrote:
> So, after i set the Sigma 300 f4 APO's focus point a few weekends ago,
> i set out Saturday to shoot a few back yard birds and such.
>
> I did not have to review the photos in LR to tell which ones would be
> in relative good focus and which ones could
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:37 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Looks like randomized subject movement to me. I seem to get similar images
> when I forget to input the proper focal length for the anti shake system
> with a manual focus lens. Usually when I go from >200mm to 24mm.
Camera seems tho think
Looks like randomized subject movement to me. I seem to get similar
images when I forget to input the proper focal length for the anti shake
system with a manual focus lens. Usually when I go from >200mm to 24mm.
On 5/22/2012 8:31 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
So, after i set the Sigma 300 f4 AP
Almost like two different lenses, in focus and bokeh.
Jeffery
Sent from my iPad
On May 22, 2012, at 19:31, David J Brooks wrote:
> So, after i set the Sigma 300 f4 APO's focus point a few weekends ago,
> i set out Saturday to shoot a few back yard birds and such.
>
> I did not have to review
So, after i set the Sigma 300 f4 APO's focus point a few weekends ago,
i set out Saturday to shoot a few back yard birds and such.
I did not have to review the photos in LR to tell which ones would be
in relative good focus and which ones could not focus. Its a hit a
miss but i'm now getting the o
6 matches
Mail list logo
