Yep, I agree; it's so important to have solid ISO 800 & 1600 quality with as
little noise as possible. Good example here, Paul. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "P N Stenquist"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 03,
would make
demonstrating so much more efficient and professional!
Tan.x.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Steven Desjardins
Sent: Thursday, 4 November 2010 3:39 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K-5 at ISO 1600
The shadows are
The shadows are very clean.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Looking good, Paul, good indeed!
>
> Boris
>
>
> On 11/3/2010 5:36 PM, P N Stenquist wrote:
>>
>> While testing the camera at 6400 and beyond is fun, good results at ISO
>> 800 and 1600 are much more important fo
Looking good, Paul, good indeed!
Boris
On 11/3/2010 5:36 PM, P N Stenquist wrote:
While testing the camera at 6400 and beyond is fun, good results at ISO
800 and 1600 are much more important for my work. I shot this little
garden nymph at ISO 1600 with the DA* 50-135 at dusk yesterday. I
conve
That ISO performance is the great equalizer. One rarely sees that ISO coupled
with a relatively slow shutter speed and a relatively large aperture. It would
be great for low light shots and shadowed shots in street photography.
Jeffery
On Nov 3, 2010, at 10:36 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
> While
While testing the camera at 6400 and beyond is fun, good results at
ISO 800 and 1600 are much more important for my work. I shot this
little garden nymph at ISO 1600 with the DA* 50-135 at dusk yesterday.
I converted in my normal fashion with a bit of fill light and curve
adjustment. It's s
6 matches
Mail list logo
