Re: K-5 at ISO 1600

2010-11-03 Thread Christine Aguila
Yep, I agree; it's so important to have solid ISO 800 & 1600 quality with as little noise as possible. Good example here, Paul. Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: "P N Stenquist" To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Wednesday, November 03,

RE: K-5 at ISO 1600

2010-11-03 Thread Tanya Love
would make demonstrating so much more efficient and professional! Tan.x. -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Steven Desjardins Sent: Thursday, 4 November 2010 3:39 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K-5 at ISO 1600 The shadows are

Re: K-5 at ISO 1600

2010-11-03 Thread Steven Desjardins
The shadows are very clean. On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: > Looking good, Paul, good indeed! > > Boris > > > On 11/3/2010 5:36 PM, P N Stenquist wrote: >> >> While testing the camera at 6400 and beyond is fun, good results at ISO >> 800 and 1600 are much more important fo

Re: K-5 at ISO 1600

2010-11-03 Thread Boris Liberman
Looking good, Paul, good indeed! Boris On 11/3/2010 5:36 PM, P N Stenquist wrote: While testing the camera at 6400 and beyond is fun, good results at ISO 800 and 1600 are much more important for my work. I shot this little garden nymph at ISO 1600 with the DA* 50-135 at dusk yesterday. I conve

Re: K-5 at ISO 1600

2010-11-03 Thread Jeffery Smith
That ISO performance is the great equalizer. One rarely sees that ISO coupled with a relatively slow shutter speed and a relatively large aperture. It would be great for low light shots and shadowed shots in street photography. Jeffery On Nov 3, 2010, at 10:36 AM, P N Stenquist wrote: > While

K-5 at ISO 1600

2010-11-03 Thread P N Stenquist
While testing the camera at 6400 and beyond is fun, good results at ISO 800 and 1600 are much more important for my work. I shot this little garden nymph at ISO 1600 with the DA* 50-135 at dusk yesterday. I converted in my normal fashion with a bit of fill light and curve adjustment. It's s