You're not obliged to buy in Belgium :-) In Poland body is around 570
Euro, kit with DA 18-55 around 690 ;-)
On 28.08.2006, at 01:02 , Thibouille wrote:
In Belgium it goes for 650euros body only. Compared to the DL: 450
euros, it is pricey.
Best regards,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/totally.shtml
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Nice review. Although, deep down in my psyche, I still rankle about the
compatibiltiy of older K-mount lenses, I did get kind of get use to the
extra step using my *ist D. I like the anti-shake feature of the K100.
The price seems right, too. Don't know If I will spring for the K100 or
In Europe the K100D isq still a bit pricey IMO.
In Belgium it goes for 650euros body only. Compared to the DL: 450
euros, it is pricey.
2006/8/28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nice review. Although, deep down in my psyche, I still rankle about the
compatibiltiy of older K-mount
Yes, good point. One reason I'm going to keep one of my *istD cameras
after the release of the 10D is due to its excellent high ISO
capability. Of course, if the 10 is better, it might join its sibling
on the block.
Paul
On Aug 27, 2006, at 9:11 PM, Douglas Newman wrote:
I did enjoy Mike's
I did enjoy Mike's review, but I am surprised to hear
that he finds something deficient about the high ISO
capability of the K100D. It should be just as good as
any other camera - or at least its *ist-series
predecessors were.
I am going to send him an e-mail and ask him to
elaborate on this
I don't think you have to worry about the K10D being better, it's very
likely going to be. As nice as the *istD is, it's not particularly good
at high ISO's. The D is noisy for a 6MP camera.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yes, good point. One reason I'm going to keep one of my *istD cameras
7 matches
Mail list logo
