Thanks to all who replied.
No - the Af500FTZ does not have an auto function (the old-fashioned
sensor in flash auto function.)
I have the AF 360FGT but it's been my main macro fash and has endured a
good degree of knocking around, and does not have a tilt and swivel head
(only a tilt head.) An
Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Thibouille
Sendt: 2. december 2006 21:49
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: K10D and AF500FTZ Flash
K10D (as K100d) do NOT
es focus assist (SB) on the K10D or ist the AF good
> enough on its own?
>
> greetings
> Markus
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Jostein Oksne
> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 7:20 PM
> To: P
I think one major drawback of the 500FTZ is it has no autocomputer possibility.
I may rememnber wrong but in my memry you either work TTL or full manual :(
One of the reason (having bodies not supporting TTL at that time) that
I went for Metz 40MZ2, years ago.
2006/12/3, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PR
Manual flash is quite easy on digital as well.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Does the AF-500 have an autoflash function? If so, it should work
> relatively well. Of course you can use the guide number as well, but
> full power isn't nice if you don't bounce it off of something.
> Paul
> On
Does the AF-500 have an autoflash function? If so, it should work
relatively well. Of course you can use the guide number as well, but
full power isn't nice if you don't bounce it off of something.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 1:24 PM, David Savage wrote:
> On 12/3/06, Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTE
As far as I know, the K10D won't do TTL, so you have to use the flash
in auto flash mode. I've used my AF400T with the K10D in autoflash
mode, and it worked well.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
> I looked in the manual and it seems to only reference the newer FGZ
> flash
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jostein Oksne
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 7:20 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D and AF500FTZ Flash
I have.
The flash fires, but massive overexposure. :-(
Jostein
On 12/2/06, Mark Cassino
Thibouille wrote:
> K10D (as K100d) do NOT supprt plain TTL. This was known and announced.
> The only way to use a TTL flash is to go either manual or autp-computer.
> No other way :(
Thanks - that seems to be the case. I have an AF360FGZ so it looks like
I'll be using that.
- MCC
--
- - - -
K10D (as K100d) do NOT supprt plain TTL. This was known and announced.
The only way to use a TTL flash is to go either manual or autp-computer.
No other way :(
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail L
All all EIs? On the *istD at EI 400 I get typically usable exposures
with a 500FTZ if the flash distance is over about 6 feet ... especially
if shooting RAW. But there was no consistency at EI 200 or EI 800.
So, I mostly dial down the 500FTZ to a manual setting that works for
the distance I'
On 12/3/06, Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked in the manual and it seems to only reference the newer FGZ
> flashes. Is the K10D compatible with the older TTL flashes, the like
> AF500 FTZ? Has anyone tried out this combo?
>
> Thanks -
>
> MCC
I did just now.
Pentax K10D, FA 50mm
I have.
The flash fires, but massive overexposure. :-(
Jostein
On 12/2/06, Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked in the manual and it seems to only reference the newer FGZ
> flashes. Is the K10D compatible with the older TTL flashes, the like
> AF500 FTZ? Has anyone tried out thi
I looked in the manual and it seems to only reference the newer FGZ
flashes. Is the K10D compatible with the older TTL flashes, the like
AF500 FTZ? Has anyone tried out this combo?
Thanks -
MCC
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo
www.markcassino.com
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
