On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Patrick Genovese wrote:
> Say for example you wanted to do contrast control flash wirelessly..
> Would it be possible to used the slave unit the main light and the
> controller for fill in ? or vice versa.
Yes, and you can dial in the Master:Slave ratio in the flash. You can
Hi Patrick,
The only Pentax D-SLR that does wireless from the camera's in built
flash is the *istD. All others require another flash unit to be
attached to control the other flash units.
There are 3 modes of wireless P-TTL flash.
Slave. Any flash that is to operated wirelessly needs to be set
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, David Savage wrote:
> I can attest that the hot shoe adapter F won't let the flash pop up
> filly (As stated in the AF-540 FGZ manual)
Even if it did (eg Z1-p), it does not clumb on the hotshoe, so the
flash is liable to lose contact with the shoe/make contact with hard
sur
Hi Kostas,
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:37:12 + (GMT), Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
>> You can do that with The AF360FGZ, AF540FGZ and the
>> builtin flash of the *istD, you can NOT do that (yet) with
>> the builtin flash of the K10D!
>
>I seem to recall Ken's transaltion to suggest it is mutually e
On 12/12/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK I just checked. I was wrong. It does use both on board flash &
> > accessory flash when the hot shoe mounted unit is set to Contrast
> > Control Sync.
>
> I thought we were talking wireless.
That's it, I'm going to bed.
:-)
Read
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, David Savage wrote:
> On 12/12/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, David Savage wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/12/06, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've never used P-TTL so please be kind to me and forgive my ignorance
on th
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Jan van Wijk wrote:
> You can do that with The AF360FGZ, AF540FGZ and the
> builtin flash of the *istD, you can NOT do that (yet) with
> the builtin flash of the K10D!
I seem to recall Ken's transaltion to suggest it is mutually exclusive
with SR or sth.
> I actually did so
On 12/12/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, David Savage wrote:
>
> > On 12/12/06, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I've never used P-TTL so please be kind to me and forgive my ignorance
> >> on the subject.
> >>
> >> The literature seems to s
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:50:44 +0100, Patrick Genovese wrote:
>I've never used P-TTL so please be kind to me and forgive my ignorance
>on the subject.
Still learning myself :-)
>The literature seems to suggest that to do wireless P-TTL you need a
>flash unit acting as a controller and
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, David Savage wrote:
> On 12/12/06, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've never used P-TTL so please be kind to me and forgive my ignorance
>> on the subject.
>>
>> The literature seems to suggest that to do wireless P-TTL you need a
>> flash unit acting as a cont
On 12/12/06, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never used P-TTL so please be kind to me and forgive my ignorance
> on the subject.
>
> The literature seems to suggest that to do wireless P-TTL you need a
> flash unit acting as a controller and a slave unit to provide the
> illumina
I've never used P-TTL so please be kind to me and forgive my ignorance
on the subject.
The literature seems to suggest that to do wireless P-TTL you need a
flash unit acting as a controller and a slave unit to provide the
illumination. Does this mean that the controller does not / can not
be setu
12 matches
Mail list logo
