I couldn't live without the battery grip. My typical virtual tour job is about
400 exposures and quite a bit of checking histograms. And I have to use the
wireless remote since my f13 exposures are typically one second or thereabouts.
I carry minimal equipmet the camera, the DA*16-50, my tripod
Joseph, I'd like to know more about that K100 of yours...
Luiz Felipe
luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br
Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:43:44 -0800, Joseph McAllister escreveu:
...snip...
> Now it's replacement is back in the BG-2 grip. I still have to buy
> another, for the other BG-2 grip. And sell the
On Dec 28, 2008, at 09:01 , John Sessoms wrote:
From: Joseph McAllister
Nice review. I surmise he did not actually have the battery grip
for his testing ("there is an optional battery
grip.").
No review I've ever read mention much about the grip, other than
the occasional mention that it
From: Joseph McAllister
Nice review. I surmise he did not actually have the battery grip for
his testing ("there is an optional battery
grip.").
No review I've ever read mention much about the grip, other than the
occasional mention that it has a second set of controls "for shooting
vertic
My comment was to the comment that he may not have had the grip for his testing.
KR often reviews camera, lenses, flashes that he has never seen.
I'll climb back in the Trekker II now.
Dave
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2008, at 10:15 , David J Brooks w
On Dec 26, 2008, at 10:15 , David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Joseph McAllister
wrote:
Nice review. I surmise he did not actually have the battery grip
for his
testing ("there is an optional battery
grip.").
Probably related to KR
Dave
Don't know who I might be
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
> Nice review. I surmise he did not actually have the battery grip for his
> testing ("there is an optional battery
> grip.").
Probably related to KR
Dave
>
> No review I've ever read mention much about the grip, other than the
> occasio
On Dec 26, 2008, at 09:13 , Paul Sorenson wrote:
No real new information but part of the title is "worthy of a Pro's
consideration". Nice to see a positive review in a magazine
targeted to "professional photographers".
http://www.rangefindermag.com/repository/rf/articles/pdf/RF1208_FirstEx
No real new information but part of the title is "worthy of a Pro's
consideration". Nice to see a positive review in a magazine targeted to
"professional photographers".
http://www.rangefindermag.com/repository/rf/articles/pdf/RF1208_FirstExposurePentax_Rettie.pdf
-p
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss M
9 matches
Mail list logo
