Kodak is shutting down some or all of its Kodachrome processing
capability in Switzerland, the only place in Europe where it's
currently being done.
Here's the catch: The headline says "Kodak announces end dates for
Kodachrome motion picture film processing". Note MOTION PICTURE FILM
PROCESSING.
.
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Kodak is shutting down some or all of its Kodachrome processing
> capability in Switzerland, the only place in Europe where it's
> currently being done.
>
> Here's the catch: The headline says "Kodak announces end dates for
> Kodachrome motion picture film processing". Note M
keith_w wrote:
>Mark Roberts wrote:
>> http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/about/news/kprocessing.jhtml?id=0.1.4.7&lc=en
>
>Buried in the above URL:
>
>"More detail on the processing of Kodak's Kodachrome 35mm slide film can be
>found under a separate press release specific to that marketplace."
Mark Roberts wrote:
> keith_w wrote:
>
>> Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>
>>> http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/about/news/kprocessing.jhtml?id=0.1.4.7&lc=en
>> Buried in the above URL:
>>
>> "More detail on the processing of Kodak's Kodachrome 35mm slide film can be
>> found under a separate press rel
Mark Roberts wrote:
> keith_w wrote:
>
>> Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>
>>> http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/about/news/kprocessing.jhtml?id=0.1.4.7&lc=en
>> Buried in the above URL:
>>
>> "More detail on the processing of Kodak's Kodachrome 35mm slide film can be
>> found under a separate press rel
Mark Roberts wrote:
> keith_w wrote:
>
>> Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>
>>> http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/about/news/kprocessing.jhtml?id=0.1.4.7&lc=en
>> Buried in the above URL:
>>
>> "More detail on the processing of Kodak's Kodachrome 35mm slide film can be
>> found under a separate press rel
keith_w wrote:
> Mark Roberts wrote:
>> keith_w wrote:
>>
>>> Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/about/news/kprocessing.jhtml?id=0.1.4.7&lc=en
>>> Buried in the above URL:
>>>
>>> "More detail on the processing of Kodak's Kodachrome 35mm slide film can be
>>> found under
On 8/17/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kodak is shutting down some or all of its Kodachrome processing
> capability in Switzerland, the only place in Europe where it's
> currently being done.
>
> Here's the catch: The headline says "Kodak announces end dates for
> Kodachrome motion p
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: Kodachrome processing: Ambiguous press release
>
> Kodak is shutting down some or all of its Kodachrome processing
> capability in Switzerland, the only place in Europe where it's
> currently being done.
>
> Here's the catch: The headline s
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Kodachrome processing: Ambiguous press release
> Kodak is shutting down some or all of its Kodachrome processing
> capability in Switzerland, the only place in Europe where it's
> currently being done.
I thin
William Robb wrote:
>From: "Mark Roberts"
>
>> Kodak is shutting down some or all of its Kodachrome processing
>> capability in Switzerland, the only place in Europe where it's
>> currently being done.
>
>I think that just leaves one K-Lab in Kansas doing all the Kodachrome in
>the world.
There'
On 8/17/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> NTW: I personally never liked Kodachrome.
>
Heretic.
;)
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/17/06, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've read a bit about the Switzerland plant closing. Apparently, the
> plant will close gradually, starting with motion picture film. I
> wouldn't expect 35mm to last through 2007. I'll try to track down
> some references for this and post
On 8/17/06, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/17/06, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've read a bit about the Switzerland plant closing. Apparently, the
> > plant will close gradually, starting with motion picture film. I
> > wouldn't expect 35mm to last through 2007
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: Kodachrome processing: Ambiguous press release
> NTW: I personally never liked Kodachrome.
heretic.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
RIP Kodachrome 1935 - 2006. What a run...
Of course, I need to remind all of you that I've been
hearing about Kodachrome's "final" demise for about 20
years. In fact, I remember that in 1992 when I was in
film school, Kodak had announced (as they did
virtually every quarter) that they were "suspen
The interesting thing here is that it clearly shows that the consumer
support laws requiring companies to support their products for 7 years
after they quit manufacturing them seem to be no longer in effect.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Pr
s Mail List
> Subject: Re: Kodachrome processing: Ambiguous press release
>
> The interesting thing here is that it clearly shows that the consumer
> support laws requiring companies to support their products for 7 years
> after they quit manufacturing them seem to be no lon
>
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/08/17 Thu PM 11:08:20 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Kodachrome processing: Ambiguous press release
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Mark
Brendan MacRae wrote:
>RIP Kodachrome 1935 - 2006. What a run...
>
>Of course, I need to remind all of you that I've been
>hearing about Kodachrome's "final" demise for about 20
>years. In fact, I remember that in 1992 when I was in
>film school, Kodak had announced (as they did
>virtually every q
On 8/18/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'vejust been looking around the Kodak web site
> (http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/prodSupportIndex.jhtml)
> Under the "Films" heading there's a listing for "Color Transparency
> Films: E-Family" (Ektachrome) but nothing for
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Mark
Roberts
Sendt: 18. august 2006 14:07
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Kodachrome processing: Ambiguous press release
Brendan MacRae wrote:
>RIP Kodachrome 1935 - 2006. What a run...
>
>Of course, I need to remind all of you that I've been
Oh, absolutely. Kodak has wanted to kill Kodachrome
for a lng time now.
One less albatross.
-Brendan
--- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brendan MacRae wrote:
>
> >RIP Kodachrome 1935 - 2006. What a run...
> >
> >Of course, I need to remind all of you that I've
> been
> >hearing
Burn 'im I say.
Scott Loveless wrote:
>On 8/17/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>NTW: I personally never liked Kodachrome.
>>
>>
>>
>Heretic.
>;)
>
>
>
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
P
Not an albatross, a legacy. Kodachrome is what Velvia wants to be...
(Ooh, that should start something).
I like Kodachrome, just haven't shot any in years. Nothing important
enough to go to the trouble and expense.
Brendan MacRae wrote:
>Oh, absolutely. Kodak has wanted to kill Kodachrome
>for
Don't get me wrong, I agree. I LOVE Kodachrome. And,
although Kodak has heard from the masses by now how
they'd like Kodak to produce it forever, it's just a
loss leader for them (hence the albatross comment).
The numbers just aren't in it for Kodak and haven't
been for years. Whether or not that's
Brendan MacRae wrote:
>has any other color film shown such incredible
>logevity?
Not yet
It's probably been a decade since Kodachrome was popular enough to
justify its existence from a business standpoint. I suspect it's a
hard-cord group of traditionalists within Kodak that have kept
Kodachrom
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: Kodachrome processing: Ambiguous press release
>
> It's probably been a decade since Kodachrome was popular enough to
> justify its existence from a business standpoint. I suspect it's a
> hard-cord
he
same about a lot of the Ektachrome. Many of those were faded. They
were all skewed to blue by various amounts.
See you later, gs
<http://georgesphotos.net>
On 8/20/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mark Roberts"
&
- Original Message -
From: "George Sinos"
Subject: Re: Kodachrome processing: Ambiguous press release
> I'll go along with that.
>
> Last year I scanned a few hundred of my Father's old slides from the
> late fifties and early sixties. At the same time
30 matches
Mail list logo
