From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Charles Robinson
On Jul 20, 2012, at 15:45, Bob W wrote:
I put all the raw files in a single folder with no hierarchical
organisation beneath it. Lightroom itself builds the date-based
indexes (which may be
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
[...]
Everyone needs to put the image files into some sort of meaningful
directory structure.
I don't.
I put all the raw files in a single folder with no hierarchical
organisation beneath it.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Well, actually you do. You just choose to use the degenerate case of a
single file directory for an arbitrary number of files which I didn't
mention. That is still some sort of *meaningful* directory structure,
although not a
On Jul 19, 2012, at 10:06 PM, David Parsons wrote:
Why are you reimporting the files? If you only deleted the files, and
the pictures are still in your catalog, just re-point them to the
backup files.
They were gone. As in not on the disk, not in the catalog. gone.
I think I have things
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
The weird thing was that if files were in the active directory tree, then
lightroom would find the duplicates and do just fine not importing them.
However, with them in the backup_by_date_imported directory tree, it just
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
I know that there are people who claim that you don't need to sort
the raw files into meaningful directories, and that's just fine until
you make a disk of jpegs for someone who wants to find something
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
You may need to make a distinction here between where you put the raw files
and where you put any 'finished' output files for distribution. If you're
not using LR as the management system for the output files then, duh, you
On Jul 20, 2012, at 15:45, Bob W wrote:
I put all the raw files in a single folder with no hierarchical organisation
beneath it. Lightroom itself builds the date-based indexes (which may be
implemented as folders, but that's of no concern to me), and I use a
combination of keywords and
It is and it isn't. With successive versions of Lightroom, I've found
its ability to recognize duplicates has become looser ... possibly
because Adobe received feedback that it was excluding new files that
had the same filename or other metadata as existing files in the
catalog had, I suspect.
The weird thing was that if files were in the active directory tree, then
lightroom would find the duplicates and do just fine not importing them.
However, with them in the backup_by_date_imported directory tree, it just
imports everything.
I know that there are people who claim that you don't
Why are you reimporting the files? If you only deleted the files, and
the pictures are still in your catalog, just re-point them to the
backup files.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I ran into some problems running out of space on my computer. In the
I ran into some problems running out of space on my computer. In the process
of trying to straighten things out, I may have deleted some files that I didn't
mean to.
My plan was to point the import menu at the backup files that lightroom makes,
sorted into backup by date. Unfortunately, even
12 matches
Mail list logo
